PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Shiseido Anessa Perfect UV Sunscreen Skincare Gel NB SPF50+ PA++++

Shiseido · Sunscreen

Shiseido Anessa Perfect UV Sunscreen Skincare Gel NB SPF50+ PA++++

Poor

Waterproof formula suggests PFAS risk; brand silence on testing warrants caution.

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant gel with PFAS concern and silent brand disclosure; acceptable for occasional use with informed caution on waterproof claims.

This waterproof gel sunscreen uses silicone and UV filters, a formulation where PFAS water-resistance additives are typical. Shiseido provides no public statement on PFAS testing or avoidance.

The safe swap

Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin

Raw Elements

Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Water-resistant gel sunscreen with silicone and UV filters

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant gel formulations routinely use fluorinated compounds to maintain hydrophobic barriers; brand silence on testing combined with waterproof marketing warrants assumption of PFAS presence unless independently verified.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Gel formulations with extended shelf life often contain preservative systems; while Shiseido typically uses modern preservatives, fragrance or preservative components may trigger contact dermatitis or irritation in sensitive individuals.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone accumulation or skin barrier disruption with chronic use

Silicone-heavy formulations can occlude skin when applied repeatedly without thorough removal; prolonged daily use without cleansing breaks may trap bacteria or compromise transepidermal water loss, particularly in humid climates.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Shiseido products subject to Japanese and international cosmetic ingredient limits; no public record of heavy metal contamination in Anessa line, though unverified third-party testing would be needed for confirmation.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

UV filter photostability or skin irritation

SPF50+ formulations require high concentrations of UV filters (typically oxybenzone, octinoxate, or newer alternatives); no specific irritation complaints on record for Anessa, but high filter load can cause irritation in compromised skin.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Shiseido Anessa Perfect UV Sunscreen Skincare Gel NB is a silicone-based water-resistant gel formulation designed to maintain SPF50+ protection during swimming or sweating. The silicone matrix allows the product to adhere to skin while repelling water, but water-resistant sunscreens typically require film-forming agents or hydrophobic coatings that often include PFAS compounds to achieve durability claims. The gel format itself carries lower risk for particulate inhalation versus spray formulations, but the chemistry enabling water resistance is the core concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Shiseido is a major Japanese cosmetics company with established compliance with Japanese and international cosmetic ingredient regulations, but the company has not published transparent testing data or statements regarding PFAS content in water-resistant products. This silence on waterproof chemistry is notable given widespread industry knowledge that fluorinated compounds are common in such formulations. No major recalls for Anessa sunscreens are on public record, but lack of proactive disclosure on persistent substances suggests a compliance-first rather than precautionary stance.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant sunscreens with silicone bases typically carry higher PFAS risk than mineral-only or non-waterproof gel alternatives. Products claiming extreme water resistance (80+ minutes) are more likely to contain PFAS than products with moderate water resistance or spray formats. Anessa's marketing emphasis on waterproof durability in tropical and aquatic contexts places it in the higher-risk segment; mineral sunscreens or non-waterproof gels generally pose lower PFAS exposure but may require more frequent reapplication.

If you buy it

Apply generously to exposed skin 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapply after swimming or heavy sweating; do not rely solely on the 80-minute claim without visual check for residue wash-off. Avoid contact with eyes and mouth; rinse thoroughly after beach or pool sessions. If using frequently (daily or multi-times weekly), consider alternating with non-waterproof or mineral formulations to reduce cumulative PFAS exposure over time. Store below 25 degrees Celsius and discard after 12 months of opening to avoid degradation of UV filter efficacy.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Shiseido has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.