Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant
Driclor Antiperspirant Roll On 20 ml
Lower PFAS concern for typical antiperspirant, but brand discloses nothing.
This standard aluminum chloride roll-on antiperspirant contains no known PFAS-prone ingredients or coatings. Brand discloses nothing about PFAS.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Aqueous aluminum chloride solution in roll-on applicator
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Driclor Antiperspirant Roll On 20 ml is made of, ingredients and materials
Driclor is formulated as an aqueous aluminum chloride solution, a well-established active antiperspirant ingredient that works by forming a plug in sweat ducts. The roll-on applicator is a liquid delivery system without the coating-degradation risks of spray or powder formats. Aluminum chloride itself is not classified as a systemic toxicant at typical dermal exposure levels, though localized skin irritation is the primary concern with high-concentration formulations like this one.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Aluminum systemic absorption and neurotoxicity concern
Repeated dermal exposure to aluminum chloride solutions raises theoretical concerns about cumulative aluminum absorption, though peer-reviewed evidence does not support clinically significant neurotoxic risk at typical antiperspirant doses. Individuals with kidney impairment or those using this daily for years should consult a physician.
Localized skin irritation and sensitization
Aluminum chloride at 20 percent concentration commonly causes contact dermatitis, redness, burning, and itching, especially on sensitive skin or with repeated application. This is the primary adverse effect documented in clinical use and manufacturer guidance.
Fragrance allergens and contact sensitizers
Driclor roll-on formulations typically include fragrance compounds that may contain known allergens; complete ingredient list should be reviewed for individual sensitivities. No specific fragrance recall is on record, but fragrances remain a common cause of contact dermatitis from cosmetics.
Applicator contamination and bacterial growth
Roll-on applicators can harbor bacteria if the ball is not cleaned or allowed to dry between uses, particularly in warm bathrooms. This does not represent a product defect but a hygiene risk inherent to the delivery mechanism.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives or banned antimicrobial agents are documented in publicly available Driclor formulations. Aqueous solutions typically use standard approved preservatives, though the full ingredient list is not always fully disclosed on packaging.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Driclor is a legacy UK brand (owned by GlaxoSmithKline dermatology division) with decades of use in clinical settings for hyperhidrosis management. The brand provides no public PFAS disclosure or third-party safety certifications, which is typical for older antiperspirant lines but represents a gap in modern transparency standards. No major safety recalls or regulatory actions specific to this product are on record in US or EU databases.
How it compares in its category
Driclor sits at the higher potency end of over-the-counter antiperspirants (20 percent aluminum chloride) compared to mass-market alternatives (typically 10-15 percent). This makes it effective for severe sweating but increases skin irritation risk. Its aqueous formulation avoids polymer coating and silica-based concerns common in powder or spray antiperspirants, positioning it as chemically simpler than many consumer alternatives.
If you buy it
Apply only to clean, dry skin and avoid use on broken or recently shaved areas to minimize irritation. Store in a cool place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent concentration changes. Discontinue and consult a dermatologist if persistent rash, severe burning, or allergic symptoms develop. This formulation has lower concern for irritation with routine care, though patch testing on a small area first is prudent if you have sensitive skin.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Antiperspirant Driclor has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Driclor Antiperspirant Roll On 20 ml?
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.