PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Driclor Antiperspirant Roll-On 20ml (3 pack)

Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant

Driclor Antiperspirant Roll-On 20ml (3 pack)

Excellent

Lower concern, aluminum antiperspirant with no documented PFAS indicators.

Verdict: BuyAluminum chlorohydrate antiperspirant with no documented PFAS or other major cosmetic hazards; standard safety profile for category.

This aluminum chlorohydrate antiperspirant has no known PFAS use or public disclosures. Roll-on cosmetic format carries minimal waterproofing or stain-resist risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Aluminum chlorohydrate active; aqueous cosmetic formulation in roll-on bottle

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Contact dermatitis and skin sensitization

Aluminum chlorohydrate at high concentrations can trigger irritation or allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; Driclor's clinical-strength formulation carries this risk. Skin reactions are typically mild and reverse upon discontinuation, but pre-existing eczema or dermatitis may be exacerbated.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Driclor formulations typically include fragrance components; while proprietary blend details are not disclosed, fragrance is a common cause of cosmetic contact allergy. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis should patch-test or seek fragrance-free alternatives.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Aluminum systemic absorption

Topical antiperspirant use does not produce systemic aluminum exposure at levels of health concern in regulatory assessments; skin acts as an effective barrier. No established link between aluminum antiperspirant use and Alzheimer's disease or other systemic toxicity has been demonstrated in peer-reviewed literature.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No documentation that Driclor uses formaldehyde releasers (imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, etc.); aqueous formulations typically rely on phenoxyethanol or other modern preservatives. Ingredient list review recommended if available on packaging to confirm.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Roll-on antiperspirants generally use minimal added colorants; regulatory limits on heavy metals (iron oxides, titanium dioxide) in cosmetics are enforced in EU and US markets. No specific contamination alerts are on record for Driclor.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Driclor's active ingredient is aluminum chlorohydrate, a widely used antiperspirant salt that works by forming plugs in sweat ducts. The product is a water-based roll-on formulation, which means it lacks the volatile organic solvents found in spray antiperspirants and thus poses lower inhalation risk. Aluminum chlorohydrate itself does not migrate significantly into skin at the concentrations used in approved cosmetics; topical application carries a different exposure profile than ingestion-based aluminum concerns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Driclor is manufactured by Stiefel Laboratories (owned by GlaxoSmithKline) and has a long market history as a clinical-strength antiperspirant. The brand does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party certifications (e.g., dermatologist testing claims are standard but not independently verified here). No major recalls or safety controversies are documented for this product line in accessible regulatory records.

How it compares in its category

Driclor sits in the clinical-strength segment, offering higher aluminum chlorohydrate concentration than standard deodorants; it is comparable to other aluminum-based antiperspirants like Certain Dri or Perspirex in safety profile. Roll-on delivery avoids inhalation hazards associated with spray formulations. The 3-pack format is typical for direct-to-consumer sales and does not introduce additional safety concerns beyond single-unit products.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin before bed for optimal efficacy and to minimize skin irritation from overnight wear. Do not use on broken or irritated skin; discontinue if rash, burning, or itching develops. Store below 25°C and away from direct sunlight to maintain stability; typical shelf life is 3 years unopened. Discontinue use if the solution becomes discolored or separates, as this may indicate formulation breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Antiperspirant Driclor has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.