PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall39/ 100Poor
Driclor Solution Roll On Applicator 20ml

Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant

Driclor Solution Roll On Applicator 20ml

Excellent

Lower concern, typical antiperspirant without known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: Buy with careAluminum chloride antiperspirant with standard safety profile; no established major hazards beyond routine aluminum exposure well within regulatory limits.

This aluminum chloride hexahydrate solution lacks disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant coatings. Roll-on applicators and aqueous solutions carry minimal PFAS risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous solution (aluminum chloride hexahydrate base), roll-on applicator housing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum systemic absorption and renal impact

Aluminum chloride can be absorbed through skin, particularly in high-concentration antiperspirants like Driclor. Long-term use has been studied for potential links to renal function and bone health; regulatory bodies (FDA, SCCS) have set safe limits for dermal aluminum exposure, and Driclor at recommended doses remains within those limits, but users with existing kidney disease should consult a ph

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation and contact dermatitis

Aluminum chloride is corrosive at high concentration and commonly triggers localized irritation, erythema, burning, or itching, especially on freshly shaved or broken skin. This is a known and expected side effect of high-strength antiperspirants and is not a product defect, but users with sensitive skin or eczema have higher risk and may not tolerate Driclor.

20/ 100
⚠️

Microorganism growth if applicator is contaminated or stored improperly

The aqueous base supports bacterial growth if the roll-on head contacts non-sterile surfaces or if the bottle is stored in damp, warm conditions. Users should avoid touching the applicator to anything other than skin and keep the cap tightly sealed; however, properly stored and handled Driclor carries no greater microbial risk than any liquid cosmetic.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergen sensitivity or undisclosed fragrance components

Driclor Solution may contain fragrance or masking agents not always fully itemized on the label; individuals with fragrance sensitivity or Multiple Chemical Sensitivity should patch-test or request a full ingredient disclosure from the manufacturer before regular use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Driclor have been documented. As a regulated pharmaceutical product in most markets, the aqueous formulation is subject to pharmacopeial purity standards, making heavy metal contamination unlikely, though independent testing is not publicly available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Driclor Solution is a liquid antiperspirant based on aluminum chloride hexahydrate (typically 20% w/v), dissolved in water with stabilizing agents. Aluminum chloride works by forming a plug in the sweat duct to reduce perspiration; it is considerably more potent than the aluminum salts in standard antiperspirants. The roll-on applicator dispenses this solution directly onto skin, minimizing waste and controlling dose. This formulation is well-established in dermatology and has been used for decades, though it is stronger and more likely to irritate sensitive skin than conventional products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Driclor is manufactured by Stiefel (part of GlaxoSmithKline) and marketed as a pharmaceutical-grade antiperspirant in many countries, often available by prescription or over-the-counter depending on region. The brand has a long clinical history with no major safety recalls or public health warnings on record. Driclor does not prominently advertise sustainability or third-party certifications; product labeling focuses on efficacy and strength rather than ingredient transparency beyond the active component. No documented controversies regarding manufacturing practices or undisclosed additives have been established in public health databases.

How it compares in its category

Driclor is a higher-strength antiperspirant compared to mass-market roll-ons and sprays; it sits between consumer deodorants and prescription-grade formulations like drysol. Its aluminum chloride concentration is significantly higher than typical consumer antiperspirants (which use aluminum zirconium or aluminum hydroxide), making it more effective for heavy sweating but also more likely to cause skin irritation. Users seeking gentler alternatives might choose aluminum-free or lower-concentration products; those with hyperhidrosis often find Driclor's potency justifies the irritation risk.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin only; applying to wet skin increases irritation risk. Start with small amounts on underarms and allow to dry fully before dressing to prevent staining and to reduce skin reactions. If irritation, itching, or rash develops, reduce frequency or discontinue and consult a dermatologist. Store at room temperature away from heat; do not expose to direct sunlight or temperatures above 25C, as heat may destabilize the formulation. The 20ml bottle typically lasts 2-3 months with daily use; replace if the solution becomes discolored or develops odor.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Antiperspirant Driclor has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.