PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Arm & Hammer U Max Antiperspirant Deodorant Stick Powder

Arm & Hammer · Deodorant

Arm & Hammer U Max Antiperspirant Deodorant Stick Powder

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern with no known intentional PFAS use, but no explicit brand assurance.

Verdict: BuyTalc-based powder antiperspirant with no established contamination record; lower PFAS risk than aerosol alternatives; standard category safety profile.

This talc and starch powder antiperspirant has no waterproof or nonstick coatings that typically contain PFAS. Arm & Hammer offers no PFAS claims or certifications.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Talc powder, starch, aluminum compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum compound skin sensitization

Aluminum zirconium and aluminum chlorohydrate are recognized contact allergens in a small percentage of users. This is category-wide, not unique to Arm & Hammer, but susceptible individuals should patch-test.

70/ 100
💨

Inhalation hazard from powder form

Talc powder can be inhaled if applied roughly or in poorly ventilated spaces. Chronic inhalation is not expected from normal deodorant use, but users with asthma or chronic lung conditions should apply with care.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc contamination (asbestos residue)

US cosmetic-grade talc has been required to be asbestos-free since the 1970s. No recalls or adverse reports specific to this Arm & Hammer product exist on public record.

95/ 100

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Arm & Hammer U Max does not list synthetic fragrance in its standard formulation (powder scent is mild), reducing common fragrance allergen risk. Full ingredient transparency is limited; no major allergen incidents are recorded.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Talc deposits can naturally contain trace metals (iron, magnesium); regulatory limits in cosmetics apply. No independent testing or reports of excess heavy metals in this specific product are available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Arm & Hammer U Max is a solid stick antiperspirant built on talc powder as the primary base, combined with aluminum compounds (likely aluminum zirconium or aluminum chlorohydrate) for sweat-blocking action and starch for texture and absorption. Talc itself is a naturally occurring mineral; the safety concern historically centered on asbestos contamination in talc mining and processing, though cosmetic-grade talc sold in the US has been subject to asbestos-free claims since the 1970s. This product does not list fragrance allergens or known endocrine disruptors in its typical formulation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arm & Hammer has not published a specific PFAS disclosure or commitment for this product line, and the brand maintains a largely silent stance on PFAS in personal care products. The company has faced no major recalls or lawsuits tied to this specific deodorant or its talc content. Arm & Hammer is owned by Church & Dwight, a large CPG manufacturer, but independent third-party certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, EWG Verified) are not listed for this product.

How it compares in its category

Talc-based powder sticks sit mid-range for safety transparency in the deodorant market. They avoid the PFAS and propellant concerns of aerosols and avoid the occlusive polymer coatings of some gel or cream antiperspirants. However, talc powders offer less precision ingredient disclosure than brands carrying third-party cosmetic certifications or "clean" marketing credentials. Compared to aluminum-free or mineral-only alternatives, this product prioritizes sweat control over ingredient minimalism.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin; avoid broken or irritated skin, as aluminum compounds can cause localized irritation in sensitive individuals. Do not inhale the powder directly; apply gently to avoid aerosolization if you have respiratory concerns. Replace the stick every 3 to 6 months or when noticeably reduced to prevent microbial growth in the container. If you experience persistent rash, swelling, or allergic reaction, discontinue and patch-test with a fragrance-free alternative.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Arm & Hammer has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.