PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall59/ 100Good
Athleta Women's Headlands Hybrid High Rise Cargo Legging

Athleta · Activewear

Athleta Women's Headlands Hybrid High Rise Cargo Legging

Good

Unclear PFAS risk; standard nylon legging, no treatment disclosed.

Verdict · SkipNylon blend legging with no known chemical hazards on record; PFAS status unclear but not a dealbreaker for athletic wear; standard care mitigates minor risks.

Athleta discloses no information on water repellent or stain-resistant finishes. Standard nylon cargo legging carries moderate concern without treatment details or third-party verification.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon blend, no treatment specified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Athleta Women's Headlands Cargo Legging is made of, ingredients and materials

This legging is a nylon blend, meaning it combines nylon (a synthetic polyamide) with other fibers, likely elastane or spandex for stretch. Nylon itself is a stable, durable synthetic that does not leach monomers or plasticizers into skin under normal wear conditions. No coating, finish, or chemical treatment is disclosed on the product, so concerns around water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes, antimicrobial treatments, or flame retardants do not apply based on available information.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Elastane fiber degradation and skin irritation risk

Elastane (spandex) in the blend degrades with heat, chlorine, and UV exposure. Degradation products are not established health hazards, but worn-out elastic loses function. Pre-wash comfort and long-term fit depend on proper care; no acute health risk is documented for nylon-elastane blends in athletic wear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Azo dyes (colorfast dyes)

No public record of azo dyes or restricted dyes in Athleta nylon leggings. Nylon accepts dyes readily and manufacturers typically use disperse dyes; no evidence of concern specific to this product or brand.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No chemical treatment is disclosed for this legging, so no basis to expect formaldehyde-based wrinkle resistance or fabric stiffening. Untreated nylon does not require or contain formaldehyde finishes.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Nylon leggings are not typically treated with flame retardants unless explicitly marketed as fire-resistant (e.g., for sports like rock climbing). No flame-retardant finish is mentioned or implied for this product.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester blend

This product is a nylon blend, not polyester. Antimony trioxide (a polyester catalyst residue) is not a concern for nylon-based fabrics.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Athleta (owned by Gap Inc.) does not publicly disclose PFAS use or avoidance in its supply chain, nor does it list third-party chemical certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or Bluesign) for this product. The brand has not faced major chemical-related recalls or public controversies specific to nylon apparel. Transparency about fabric treatments and chemical inputs remains limited, which is typical across mainstream athletic brands but a gap for informed buyers.

How it compares in its category

Nylon-blend leggings are standard in mid-market athletic wear and are chemically less complex than wool or treated cotton alternatives. Unlike leggings with explicit water-repellent coating or antimicrobial finishes, this product avoids disclosed chemical treatments, placing it in a lower-concern position within the category. Certified sustainable or organic athletic brands (Patagonia, Girlfriend Collective) offer more transparent chemical disclosure, but they command a significant price premium.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water and mild detergent to avoid degradation of elastane fibers and preserve fit. Avoid high heat dryers, which can damage nylon fibers and elastic components over time. No special precautions are needed beyond standard athletic-wear care. Replace when elasticity noticeably declines (typically 12-24 months with regular use) or seams show wear; worn elastic or seam failure does not pose a hazard but indicates end of functional life.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Athleta has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More activewear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.