PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
AXE Antiperspirant Deodorant Dark Temptation Scent

Axe · Deodorant

AXE Antiperspirant Deodorant Dark Temptation Scent

Excellent

Low PFAS risk for typical antiperspirant; no known issues but no transparency.

Verdict: BuyStandard antiperspirant with typical hazard profile; no specific safety recalls; PFAS score acceptable; brand transparency limited but material risks manageable.

This aluminum-based antiperspirant lacks fluorine-containing coatings or water-repellent treatments that commonly harbor PFAS. Axe provides no PFAS ingredient screening or third-party testing data.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

propylene glycol, talc, fragrance blend, aluminum compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

AXE does not disclose the full fragrance blend composition (standard industry practice under trade secret protection). Dark Temptation's fragrance may contain common allergens such as limonene, linalool, or cinnamyl alcohol. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or dermatitis should patch-test or choose unscented alternatives.

70/ 100
⚠️

Propylene glycol skin irritation

Propylene glycol is generally safe but can cause contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals at high concentrations. In antiperspirants, concentrations are typically low (under 5 percent), minimizing risk; however, repeated application to sensitive or compromised skin may trigger localized irritation.

70/ 100
⚠️

Preservative-related irritation or sensitization

AXE does not publicly list all preservatives; formulas may contain parabens or other antimicrobials not disclosed on packaging. Preservative allergies are individual; discontinuation of use is the primary remedy if sensitization occurs.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc contamination and asbestos risk

Cosmetic-grade talc in regulated markets (US, EU) is required to be asbestos-free. No recalls or contamination reports exist for AXE deodorants specifically. Historical asbestos risk in talc has largely been addressed through supply-chain controls, though residual concern persists in some consumer discussions.

95/ 100

Aluminum systemic absorption

Aluminum absorption through intact skin from antiperspirants is minimal and not considered a public health concern by major health authorities (FDA, EMA). No causal link between antiperspirant use and Alzheimer's disease has been established in peer-reviewed epidemiology; this remains a consumer concern without scientific support.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

AXE Dark Temptation contains propylene glycol (humectant and solvent), talc (absorbent), aluminum compounds (active antiperspirant agent), and a proprietary fragrance blend. Propylene glycol is widely used in cosmetics and generally recognized as safe at these concentrations. Talc carries historical concern for asbestos contamination, though cosmetic-grade talc in developed markets is now regulated to exclude asbestos. Aluminum in antiperspirants is absorbed minimally through intact skin; systemic exposure is considered low for typical use patterns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Axe (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient safety assessments or third-party certifications for this line. The brand has faced no major safety recalls on this specific product in public records. Unilever has committed to fragrance transparency in some product lines but has not extended detailed allergen or chemical disclosure to all Axe deodorants. No major controversy specific to Dark Temptation is documented.

How it compares in its category

This is a conventional spray or stick antiperspirant; its formulation is typical for mass-market deodorants in terms of active aluminum levels and carrier materials. Premium or natural alternatives often substitute talc with cornstarch or mica, or use aluminum salts at lower concentrations, but efficacy trade-offs exist. AXE's cost and availability place it in the middle-market segment; it does not claim hypoallergenic or dermatologist-tested status prominently.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin and allow to dry fully before dressing to minimize irritation and staining. Do not use on broken, irritated, or freshly shaved skin. Replace every 12-24 months or when performance declines, as fragrance and preservative efficacy degrade. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or persistent irritation develops; reactions to fragrance compounds or propylene glycol are individually variable. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to prevent propellant degradation (if spray format).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Axe has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.