PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall59/ 100Good
Axe Antiperspirant Deodorant Stick

Axe · Deodorant

Axe Antiperspirant Deodorant Stick

Good

Low concern, but Axe has not disclosed PFAS status; request information directly.

Verdict: SkipStandard antiperspirant with low established hazard profile; PFAS status unconfirmed but not flagged; safe for typical use with normal precautions.

This basic stick uses talc, wax, and fragrance with no water-resistant coatings or Teflon-family coating announced. Unilever hasn't made public PFAS disclosures for this line, and some antiperspirants can contain trace PFAS without third-party verification.

The safe swap

Herbal Deodorant (50 ml)

Aesop

Herbal Deodorant (50 ml)

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

talc/starch base, wax, fragrance, aluminum compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen / contact dermatitis

Axe uses undisclosed fragrance blends; synthetic fragrance components are common allergens. Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance intolerance may experience mild redness or irritation; patch testing recommended for known fragrance-sensitive users.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Talc contamination risk (asbestos/silicates)

Cosmetic-grade talc in regulated markets (USA, EU) is tested for asbestos and meets purity standards; no specific contamination reported for Axe products, but talc sourcing is not disclosed by brand.

95/ 100

Aluminum compound safety (systemic absorption)

Aluminum chlorohydrate in antiperspirants is recognized safe by FDA and EU for topical use; absorption through intact skin is minimal and does not raise organ-level concern at typical use frequency.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public evidence that Axe antiperspirant formulations use formaldehyde donors; standard preservation systems in stick formats do not typically require formaldehyde releasers, but full preservative list is proprietary.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Axe antiperspirant sticks use minimal color; regulated cosmetic colorants are screened for lead and cadmium. No documented contamination in Axe products.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Axe Antiperspirant Deodorant Stick uses a talc or starch base mixed with wax, aluminum compounds (likely aluminum chlorohydrate), and fragrance oils. Talc-based formulations have historical concern around asbestos contamination, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is regulated for purity in most markets. The aluminum active ingredient is standard in antiperspirants and sits on skin surface rather than absorbing systemically in meaningful amounts. Fragrance components are undisclosed proprietary blends, which limits transparency on potential allergens.

The brand's record and disclosure

Axe (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or testing status, and the brand maintains minimal transparency on detailed ingredient sourcing or safety certifications beyond regulatory compliance. No major product recalls or established safety controversies specific to Axe antiperspirant formulations are on public record. The brand follows standard industry practice of relying on ingredient-level safety data rather than end-product testing disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Axe antiperspirant sits in the mass-market segment with formulations typical of mainstream deodorant sticks. Products in this tier generally use talc or starch base, aluminum salts, and synthetic fragrance, making Axe materially comparable to most competitors (Degree, Old Spice stick formats). Premium or natural alternatives may substitute arrowroot or mica for talc, or use zinc ricinoleate instead of aluminum, but Axe's profile is standard, not outlier.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to clean, dry underarm skin; avoid broken skin or irritated areas where aluminum and fragrance may cause irritation. Do not inhale aerosol versions; stick format carries no inhalation risk. Replace or discontinue if rash, burning, or persistent irritation develops. Store below 25°C away from direct heat, as wax base may soften; no special maintenance required beyond normal storage.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Axe has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.