PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Ban AHA Roll-On Serum Deodorant

Ban · Deodorant

Ban AHA Roll-On Serum Deodorant

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Liquid serum without known PFAS risk factors.

Verdict: BuyWater-based serum deodorant with no established hazard record; low PFAS concern; typical safety profile for liquid roll-on category.

Ban's roll-on serum is a water-based liquid without water-repellent or nonstick treatments that typically require PFAS. No public disclosures or detections reported.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water-based serum, roll-on applicator (likely polypropylene/steel)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Ban AHA Roll-On Serum is fragrance-containing. Fragrance is listed as an ingredient but specific allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) are not disclosed. Sensitive individuals should patch-test or verify fragrance ingredients with the brand directly.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from AHA at high concentration

Alpha-hydroxy acids can cause mild stinging, redness, or sensitization in reactive or damaged skin, especially if used daily. This is an intended mechanism (mild exfoliation) rather than a safety defect, but users with sensitive skin should monitor for adverse reactions.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

1,4-dioxane (impurity in surfactants)

Water-based serum deodorants may contain ethoxylated surfactants that could harbor trace 1,4-dioxane. No test results or recalls specific to Ban AHA Roll-On confirm this; the risk is theoretical and applies broadly to the category.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Liquid deodorant serums typically contain minimal pigmentation. No lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination has been reported in Ban deodorant products; regulatory testing by FDA does not flag this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde donors (DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) have been identified in Ban deodorant formulations reviewed in public safety databases. Water-based serums more commonly use paraben or phenoxyethanol preservatives.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban AHA Roll-On Serum Deodorant is a water-based liquid formulation, not a traditional antiperspirant stick or spray. The active ingredient is likely an alpha-hydroxy acid (AHA) compound combined with water-soluble deodorant agents. The roll-on applicator is typically polypropylene plastic with a steel or stainless ball, neither of which poses leaching risk at room temperature or during normal skin contact. Water-based serums avoid the volatility and fume concerns associated with powder or aerosol deodorants.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ban (SC Johnson owned) has a mixed transparency record on ingredient safety. The brand does not appear to have made public commitments to PFAS avoidance or phase-out, though no PFAS-containing formulations have been confirmed in this specific product line. Ban deodorants have not been subject to recent recalls or regulatory warnings related to heavy metals, allergens, or carcinogens. The company does list ingredients on packaging but does not publish third-party safety certifications for this product.

How it compares in its category

Liquid serum deodorants occupy a lower-risk segment compared to aluminum-based antiperspirants or talc powders. This AHA variant is positioned as a gentler alternative to traditional chemical deodorants and sits between natural/mineral deodorants and conventional stick formulas in terms of ingredient complexity. No performance or safety advantages over other water-based or plant-derived deodorants are established, but no disadvantages either. Price and consumer preference are the main differentiators.

If you buy it

Roll-on applicators should be stored upright at room temperature and kept clean to prevent bacterial growth at the ball applicator. Do not expose the container to direct heat or leave in hot vehicles, as the plastic housing (though not hazardous) may warp. Replace every 6-12 months or when the serum separates or thickens. If skin irritation develops, discontinue use; water-based formulas with AHAs can cause mild sensitization in very reactive skin, though this is not unique to Ban's product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.