PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Ban Antiperspirant Deodorant Invisible Solid for Women and Men, Shower Fresh, 2.6 oz, Size: 2.6 fl oz

Ban · Deodorant

Ban Antiperspirant Deodorant Invisible Solid for Women and Men, Shower Fresh, 2.6 oz, Size: 2.6 fl oz

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Standard solid antiperspirant with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyStandard solid antiperspirant with talc and typical fragrance; no established safety incidents or hazardous ingredients on record for Ban brand.

Ban's solid antiperspirant uses conventional powder and wax bases without water-repellent or nonstick treatments that typically require PFAS. No public PFAS claims or issues documented.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

starch, talc, wax, fragrance (typical antiperspirant solid)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🪨

Talc contamination (asbestos risk)

Talc ore can contain asbestos depending on mining location and processing controls. Ban does not publicly disclose talc sourcing or asbestos testing results, so contamination risk cannot be ruled out but is not confirmed for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen load

Ban Invisible Solid contains a proprietary fragrance blend typical of mass-market deodorants. Fragrance mixtures are known contact allergens; individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivity may experience irritation, though serious reactions are uncommon.

45/ 100
🔩

Aluminum salt systemic absorption

Antiperspirant aluminum compounds remain at the skin surface and are not systemically absorbed in meaningful amounts during normal topical use. However, some individuals report skin irritation or sensitivity to aluminum salts, particularly if applied to compromised or freshly shaved skin.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No established recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in Ban Invisible Solid pigments. Mass-market cosmetic colorants are regulated under FDA guidelines, and this product has no known violations on record.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public disclosure or safety alerts indicate formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in this product formulation. Ban uses standard cosmetic preservative systems without documented formaldehyde donor compounds.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Invisible Solid is a conventional stick antiperspirant built on a starch-wax-talc base with aluminum salts as the active antiperspirant agent and fragrance for scent. The starch and wax provide the stick structure and glide, while talc is the traditional carrier mineral in this format. This formulation is chemically stable at room temperature and does not require heating during application, which eliminates thermal degradation concerns common to aerosols.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ban (owned by Energizer Holdings) maintains basic safety compliance with FDA cosmetic regulations but does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party certifications. The brand has no major recalls or safety controversies on record for this product line. Ban does not voluntarily disclose talc sourcing transparency or testing for asbestos contamination, which is standard industry practice but not publicly stated.

How it compares in its category

Ban Invisible Solid is a mainstream solid antiperspirant at typical market pricing and formulation strength. It sits in the conventional category alongside Dove, Secret, and Degree, all using talc-starch-wax bases. Aluminum-free alternatives (e.g., Primal Pit Paste, Native) exist but are premium-priced; talc-free solid options are less common and often pricier.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin for optimal performance and to avoid skin irritation from sweat interaction. Store below 80F to prevent stick warping or separation, though the product will not degrade chemically at moderate room temperatures. Replace when depleted or if you notice visible cracking, which indicates loss of binder integrity. If you develop persistent rashes or respiratory sensitivity to the fragrance, discontinue use and switch to fragrance-free or aluminum-free formats.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.