PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Ban Deodorant Invisible Solid

Ban · Deodorant

Ban Deodorant Invisible Solid

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Standard deodorant formula with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyStandard solid deodorant with talc as known ingredient; no established safety red flags or recalls; routine use safe with normal precautions.

Ban Invisible Solid contains wax and talc without waterproofing or stain-resistant coatings that typically contain PFAS. No public PFAS information or independent testing exists.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

stearic acid, talc, wax base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Ban lists 'fragrance' as a proprietary blend without ingredient breakdown. Common deodorant fragrances (synthetic musks, cinnamaldehyde) can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No specific fragrance scandal or widespread complaints tied to this product are on record.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc (asbestos contamination risk)

No recalls or positive asbestos tests reported for Ban Invisible Solid. Talc sourcing and testing practices are not publicly disclosed by the brand, so third-party verification is unavailable. Industry-wide talc is regulated but not systematically tested by manufacturers for consumer deodorants.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No FDA or independent testing has flagged lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Ban Invisible Solid. Talc and wax bases are low-risk for metal accumulation, but cosmetic colorants are not routinely disclosed or tested by the brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Solid stick deodorants rely on low water content and wax/stearic acid stability, reducing preservative need. No formaldehyde or DMDM hydantoin are listed in available product information for this formula.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct in ethoxylated ingredients)

Ban Invisible Solid does not list ethoxylated surfactants or emulsifiers (e.g., polysorbates), so 1,4-dioxane contamination is unlikely. No third-party testing of this product for dioxane is publicly available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Invisible Solid is a wax-based stick deodorant built on stearic acid (a fatty acid emollient), talc (moisture-absorbing mineral), and wax binders. This formulation is typical for antiperspirant-free deodorants and is chemically stable at room temperature, meaning no volatile off-gassing or thermal degradation during normal use. Stearic acid and wax do not leach into skin under standard application.

The brand's record and disclosure

Henkel (Ban's parent company) does not publish detailed fragrance or talc sourcing transparency on this product's label or website. Ban has no documented recalls for this specific product in FDA or CPSC databases. The brand has not made public commitments to talc testing or heavy-metal screening in cosmetics, which is routine for some competitors but not mandatory.

How it compares in its category

Solid stick deodorants using talc are industry standard and generally safer than aerosol sprays (no inhalation risk) or gel formulas (lower dermal irritation). Products with certified talc (asbestos-free) or talc-free alternatives exist but cost more. Ban's formula sits in the conventional, unspecialized middle of the market with no unusual additives.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent wax bloom or softening. Replace when depleted or if visible cracks appear in the stick. Apply sparingly to underarms; excess does not improve efficacy and increases skin contact time. Discontinue if rash or irritation develops; talc sensitivity is rare but possible in individuals with sensitive skin.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.