PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Ban Invisible Solid Antiperspirant Deodorant

Ban · Deodorant

Ban Invisible Solid Antiperspirant Deodorant

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Standard solid stick with no known PFAS-prone treatments.

Verdict: BuyWax-mineral solid stick with no established heavy-metal or fragrance hazards; lower PFAS concern; safe mainstream choice.

Ban Invisible Solid uses wax and minerals without water-repellent or nonstick treatments linked to PFAS. No brand PFAS disclosure exists, though solid deodorants carry minimal risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax and mineral-based solid stick

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum salts (systemic absorption risk)

Antiperspirant aluminum chlorohydrate is applied topically; dermal penetration is low under normal use. Long-term daily exposure remains epidemiologically debated but not established as a toxicity hazard at deodorant concentrations. Ban does not disclose aluminum compound type or concentration.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Ban Invisible lists fragrance as an ingredient but does not itemize components. Synthetic fragrance blends may contain limonene, linalool, or other sensitizers that trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No allergen disclosure is provided.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc or talc-like powder excipients

No talc is identified in Ban Invisible Solid's published formulation. Solid stick products typically use starch or silica as absorbers, not talc, reducing asbestos contamination risk.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Ban Invisible Solid uses approved FD&C colorants and mica; no lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination has been reported or recalled. Standard cosmetic pigment sourcing applies.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Solid wax sticks do not rely on aqueous preservatives that generate formaldehyde (such as DMDM hydantoin). Ban's formulation appears to use paraben or phenolic preservatives; no known formaldehyde-release issue has been documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Invisible Solid is a paraffin-wax and mineral-oil based stick antiperspirant, the most common formulation in mass-market deodorants. The solid matrix minimizes need for emulsifiers, solvents, or propellants that trigger contamination concerns in sprays or gels. Aluminum compounds (typically aluminum chlorohydrate) deliver the antiperspirant effect; they are localized to skin application with minimal systemic absorption at typical use levels. No fragrance allergen list is publicly disclosed by the brand, but the product uses standard synthetic fragrance blends common across Ban's line.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ban (SC Johnson subsidiary) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy-metal testing, or fragrance component transparency. The brand has not faced major safety recalls or contamination lawsuits in recent decades. No third-party certifications (clean beauty, dermatologist endorsement, or fragrance-free status) are claimed. Ban's parent company has faced historical criticism on transparency but maintains compliance with FDA cosmetic regulations and CLP labeling in EU markets.

How it compares in its category

Solid stick antiperspirants like Ban rank lower-risk than spray deodorants (no inhalation concerns) and aluminum-free natural sticks (which often substitute untested essential oils or plant extracts). Ban Invisible is a conservative, well-tested formulation used by millions; it is mid-tier in transparency compared to indie brands that publish third-party safety data, but ahead of no-disclosure budget brands. The product has stable market presence, indicating consistent manufacturing and no endemic quality-control red flags.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin in thin strokes; avoid open cuts or irritated underarm skin, as aluminum salts can sting. Store below 25C to prevent the wax base softening and deforming in the stick. Replace every 6-8 weeks for hygiene. If you develop rash, contact dermatitis, or axillary irritation after first use, patch-test on inner arm before reuse. Rinse hands immediately after application to avoid accidental ingestion residue.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.