PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Ban Powder Fresh Clear Gel Antiperspirant Deodorant

Ban · Deodorant

Ban Powder Fresh Clear Gel Antiperspirant Deodorant

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Typical cosmetic gel without known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyGel antiperspirant with typical cosmetic safety profile; no established heavy metal or formaldehyde concerns; PFAS level acceptable for category.

Ban's gel antiperspirant uses standard cosmetic thickeners with no waterproofing or nonstick ingredients typical of PFAS formulas. Brand discloses nothing about PFAS despite minimal product risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

gel, starch/polymer thickener base, fragrance

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Gel formula includes fragrance blend ('Powder Fresh' scent); specific allergens not disclosed. Contact dermatitis risk is low-to-moderate for sensitive skin users, typical of scented deodorants.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (cosmetic contaminant)

If surfactants or emulsifiers are ethoxylated (e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate ethoxylate), trace 1,4-dioxane may be present as a manufacturing byproduct. Ban does not publish contaminant testing; risk is typical for mid-market cosmetics, not product-specific.

70/ 100
🔩

Skin irritation from aluminum antiperspirant

Aluminum compounds are the active antiperspirant agent and can cause irritation, rash, or hypersensitivity in a subset of users. This is inherent to the product class, not a manufacturing defect, and reversible upon discontinuation.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of DMDM hydantoin or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in Ban Powder Fresh Clear Gel. Standard cosmetic preservatives are likely (methylisothiazolinone, sodium benzoate), which do not generate formaldehyde.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Clear gel format avoids talc and colored pigments, eliminating two common routes for lead or cadmium ingress. No recalls or test reports document metal contamination in this product.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Powder Fresh Clear Gel is a gel-based antiperspirant deodorant, typically formulated with aluminum compounds (active antiperspirant), starch or polymer thickeners for texture, and fragrance blends. Clear gel formulations avoid talc and colored pigments, which reduces certain contamination risks. The starch or cellulose-derived thickener base is inert and not a known leaching or off-gassing hazard in leave-on cosmetics applied to skin.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ban (Henkel subsidiary) does not prominently disclose detailed ingredient sourcing or independent safety certifications on their website. The brand has not faced major recalls or public safety controversies related to this product line. No formal PFAS statement exists from Ban, though their silence on the issue is typical for mid-market deodorant brands; absence of transparency does not indicate presence of PFAS.

How it compares in its category

Ban Powder Fresh Clear Gel sits in the mid-market antiperspirant category. Compared to roll-on or spray formats, gel reduces inhalation risk (no aerosol propellant) and avoids talc concerns. It is less premium than brands with published safety certifications but more transparent than store-brand alternatives in many retailers. Functionally typical for antiperspirant performance without unusual additive flags.

If you buy it

Apply as directed to clean, dry underarm skin; avoid application to broken or irritated skin. Replace if separated, discolored, or after 3 years of storage, as polymer thickeners can degrade. Do not ingest; keep away from eyes and children. If skin irritation or rash develops, discontinue and rinse thoroughly with water.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.