PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Desodorante Ban 2.6 OZ – Shower Fresh / Powder Fresh | Protección Todo el Día Shower Fresh

Ban · Deodorant

Desodorante Ban 2.6 OZ – Shower Fresh / Powder Fresh | Protección Todo el Día Shower Fresh

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Solid deodorant where PFAS is unlikely.

Verdict: BuyPowder stick deodorant with no established hazard record; talc/starch base and aluminum compounds are standard-use safe at typical exposure levels.

Ban's solid stick deodorant uses powder, fragrance, and mineral compounds without Teflon-family coating coatings or water-resistance chemistry. No public PFAS disclosure needed for this product type.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Powder/stick deodorant base (typical, talc or starch, fragrance, aluminum/zinc compounds)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🪨

Talc contamination (asbestos/crystalline silica)

If this formula uses talc (common in powder deodorants), talc ore can contain asbestos or crystalline silica depending on mining and milling standards. Ban does not specify talc source or purity testing on product labeling. Dermal exposure to talc is considered low-risk at deodorant doses, but chronic inhalation is linked to respiratory concern; use without inhaling powder directly.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed)

Shower Fresh and Powder Fresh fragrances are proprietary blends; specific allergens like limonene, citral, or geraniol are not listed on packaging. Fragrance is a common contact irritant and sensitizer in deodorants. Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance allergy history should patch-test first or choose unscented alternatives.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Aluminum salt systemic absorption

Epidemiological evidence does not support a causal link between topical aluminum deodorant use and systemic toxicity or Alzheimer's disease at typical exposure levels. Absorption through intact skin is minimal. This remains a consumer concern despite lack of scientific support.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Powder stick deodorants rarely require potent preservatives due to low water content. No preservative-related recalls or toxicity reports exist for Ban deodorant products. If present, levels would be expected to be below cosmetic safety thresholds.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Ban does not disclose whether pigments or fragrance compounds are tested for lead, cadmium, or arsenic. Mass-market deodorants are not routinely tested for heavy metals in published safety records. Risk is theoretical rather than documented for this product.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Shower Fresh is a powder-based stick deodorant, typically formulated with talc or cornstarch as the primary absorbent, aluminum or zinc salts for antiperspirant effect, fragrance compounds, and binding agents. The solid stick format means minimal water content and reduced microbial growth risk compared to sprays or liquids. Aluminum compounds in deodorants (aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex gly is common) are applied topically in small amounts and have no established link to systemic harm at deodorant-use levels, despite longstanding consumer concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ban (Church & Dwight subsidiary) does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing, allergen testing protocols, or third-party safety certifications on product packaging or website. The brand has no recorded recalls, regulatory warnings, or settled safety lawsuits for this product line. Ban does not claim hypoallergenic, talc-free, or aluminum-free status on this Shower Fresh variant, suggesting a conventional formulation without reformulation-driven marketing claims.

How it compares in its category

Powder stick deodorants occupy the middle ground of the category: safer than aerosol sprays (no inhalation risk), more stable than roll-ons or gels (less water = lower bacterial risk), but less transparent than boutique or clean-label brands that list every ingredient and sourcing claim. Ban's standard formulation is broadly comparable to mass-market competitors (Secret, Degree, Old Spice stick variants); none disclose talc purity or fragrance allergen profiling as standard practice.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources (powder bases can cake or degrade in humidity or warmth). Replace every 12-18 months or when effectiveness visibly decreases. If skin irritation, redness, or rash develops, discontinue and consider switching to an aluminum-free or fragrance-free variant. Do not inhale powder directly; apply by rolling or rubbing onto dry skin only.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 70% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.