PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
LION Ban Premium Gold Label Sweat Block Deodorant Stick

Ban · Deodorant

LION Ban Premium Gold Label Sweat Block Deodorant Stick

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Typical deodorant with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyBan Premium Gold has no established safety recalls or banned ingredients; typical deodorant stick with low hazard profile for normal use.

Ban Premium Gold is a basic deodorant stick with wax, starch, and talc, no waterproofing, nonstick, or stain-resistant coatings. No public PFAS claim or test data available.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Deodorant stick, wax/starch/talc base typical

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum zirconium systemic absorption

Aluminum antiperspirant salts are absorbed transdermally at low levels; long-term safety is considered acceptable by FDA and dermatological consensus, though some consumers avoid aluminum-based products due to unproven links to Alzheimer's. This is a category-wide consideration, not unique to Ban.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitization

Ban Premium Gold contains added fragrance, which may trigger contact dermatitis or allergic response in individuals with fragrance sensitivity. The product does not disclose specific fragrance ingredients (typically protected as trade secrets), limiting ability to avoid known allergens like limonene or linalool.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from antimicrobial additives

Some Ban formulations may contain triclosan or other antimicrobials (though regulatory trends have phased many out). If present, these can cause contact sensitization in susceptible individuals; Ban does not clearly disclose antimicrobial ingredients on typical product labels.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or contamination reports are on record for Ban Premium Gold specifically. Talc mining and processing standards in the U.S. are regulated by FDA and require asbestos-free certification; however, no independent third-party testing of this product line has been publicly disclosed.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Wax base oxidation and rancidity

Over time, wax carriers can oxidize if exposed to heat or light, leading to off-odors or minor skin irritation. Storage in cool conditions minimizes this; no field reports of premature degradation or safety incidents have been documented.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ban Premium Gold is a solid stick deodorant based on wax, starch, and talc as the primary dry carriers, with aluminum zirconium as the active antiperspirant. The formulation is designed to reduce moisture and odor without requiring propellant spray, which eliminates inhalation risk from pressurized aerosols. Talc-based deodorant sticks have been used safely for decades when applied topically to underarms in normal quantities, though talc sourcing and purity standards vary by manufacturer.

The brand's record and disclosure

Edgewell Personal Care (Ban's parent company) has not issued public statements regarding PFAS use in Ban deodorants, nor has the product faced FDA warning letters or recalls related to talc contamination or heavy metals. Ban does not carry third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) on this product line. The brand has maintained a stable market presence without documented safety controversies specific to this formulation.

How it compares in its category

Ban Premium Gold sits in the mainstream antiperspirant category alongside Secret, Degree, and Dove; all rely on aluminum salts and talc or starch as dry carriers. Unlike natural/talc-free alternatives (e.g., Natives, Schmidts), it prioritizes antiperspirant efficacy over mineral-free claims, which appeals to heavy perspirers. Compared to aerosol sprays, the stick format eliminates concerns about inhaled particles and fragrance volatiles.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry underarms once daily or as needed; avoid application to broken skin or immediately after shaving to minimize irritation. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent melting or separation of wax from powder. Replace when the stick is depleted or if you notice rancid odor (sign of oxidized wax). Discontinue use if persistent rash, burning, or allergic reaction develops and patch-test on a small area first if you have sensitive skin.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 70% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ban has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.