Baxter of California · Deodorant
Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk Deodorant
Lower PFAS concern; standard cosmetic deodorant without water-resistance claims.
This stick deodorant is a standard cosmetic with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant treatments requiring PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims either way.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Stick deodorant base (waxes, starches, mineral pigments)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Baxter of California Citrus Musk Deodorant is made of, ingredients and materials
Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk is a traditional wax-and-starch stick deodorant, relying on mineral pigments and botanical fragrance compounds rather than synthetic polymers or water-resistant coatings. The base formula typically contains beeswax, candelilla wax, or similar natural waxes combined with cornstarch or rice powder to absorb moisture and provide slip. This material class avoids the complex polymer networks and emulsifiers common in aluminum-free or charcoal deodorants, reducing chemical complexity and leaching risk.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens (citrus and herbal compounds)
Citrus essential oils and herbal musks are known skin sensitizers in some individuals. No specific allergic reaction recalls for this product are on record, but sensitivity varies widely depending on skin type and pre-existing allergies.
Skin irritation from starch or mineral base
Cornstarch or rice powder in stick deodorants can trap moisture and promote microbial growth in skin folds if not washed off daily, or cause irritation in individuals with sensitive or broken skin. This is a use-dependent risk, not a formulation defect.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Talc or asbestos contamination in mineral pigments
Cosmetic-grade mineral pigments used in deodorants are regulated under FDA guidelines and supplier certifications generally exclude talc or asbestos. Baxter of California does not list talc in published ingredients for this product, and no contamination reports have surfaced.
Heavy metals
Deodorants are not ingested and skin exposure is minimal; heavy metal contamination in cosmetic pigments is rare under current FDA oversight. No published testing or complaints linking this product to metal contamination exist.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Wax-based stick deodorants typically rely on the antimicrobial properties of wax and essential oils rather than formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. This product's ingredient profile does not indicate synthetic preservative systems known to release formaldehyde.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Baxter of California positions itself as a grooming brand focused on natural and heritage formulations. The company does not publicly disclose third-party certifications (EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or NSF) for this product, and ingredient transparency on its website or packaging is standard but not detailed. No established recalls, safety warnings, or controversy surrounding this specific deodorant or the brand's formulation practices have been published in consumer safety databases or regulatory records.
How it compares in its category
This product sits in the mid-market natural deodorant segment. Unlike aluminum-based antiperspirants, it makes no sweat-blocking claims and carries no risk of aluminum absorption. Compared to charcoal or clay deodorants, which sometimes contain talc or other minerals with contamination potential, a wax-starch base is chemically simpler and less prone to irritation. It is less feature-heavy than spray or gel formats, which often contain propellants or volatile solvents.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place to prevent the wax base from softening or separating, especially in summer climates. Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin; the starch and wax combination is effective without heavy layering. Replace when the stick has worn down or if the texture becomes grainy or discolored, typically every 2-3 months with daily use. If you experience skin irritation, discontinue and check the fragrance compound list on the package, as citrus and herbal oils can trigger sensitivity in some users.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Baxter of California has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk Deodorant?
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.