PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk Deodorant

Baxter of California · Deodorant

Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk Deodorant

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; standard cosmetic deodorant without water-resistance claims.

Verdict: BuyStick deodorant with standard cosmetic-grade waxes and starches; no established hazards; lower PFAS profile supports safe use.

This stick deodorant is a standard cosmetic with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant treatments requiring PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims either way.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Stick deodorant base (waxes, starches, mineral pigments)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (citrus and herbal compounds)

Citrus essential oils and herbal musks are known skin sensitizers in some individuals. No specific allergic reaction recalls for this product are on record, but sensitivity varies widely depending on skin type and pre-existing allergies.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from starch or mineral base

Cornstarch or rice powder in stick deodorants can trap moisture and promote microbial growth in skin folds if not washed off daily, or cause irritation in individuals with sensitive or broken skin. This is a use-dependent risk, not a formulation defect.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc or asbestos contamination in mineral pigments

Cosmetic-grade mineral pigments used in deodorants are regulated under FDA guidelines and supplier certifications generally exclude talc or asbestos. Baxter of California does not list talc in published ingredients for this product, and no contamination reports have surfaced.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Deodorants are not ingested and skin exposure is minimal; heavy metal contamination in cosmetic pigments is rare under current FDA oversight. No published testing or complaints linking this product to metal contamination exist.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wax-based stick deodorants typically rely on the antimicrobial properties of wax and essential oils rather than formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. This product's ingredient profile does not indicate synthetic preservative systems known to release formaldehyde.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Baxter of California Citrus & Herbal Musk is a traditional wax-and-starch stick deodorant, relying on mineral pigments and botanical fragrance compounds rather than synthetic polymers or water-resistant coatings. The base formula typically contains beeswax, candelilla wax, or similar natural waxes combined with cornstarch or rice powder to absorb moisture and provide slip. This material class avoids the complex polymer networks and emulsifiers common in aluminum-free or charcoal deodorants, reducing chemical complexity and leaching risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Baxter of California positions itself as a grooming brand focused on natural and heritage formulations. The company does not publicly disclose third-party certifications (EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or NSF) for this product, and ingredient transparency on its website or packaging is standard but not detailed. No established recalls, safety warnings, or controversy surrounding this specific deodorant or the brand's formulation practices have been published in consumer safety databases or regulatory records.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mid-market natural deodorant segment. Unlike aluminum-based antiperspirants, it makes no sweat-blocking claims and carries no risk of aluminum absorption. Compared to charcoal or clay deodorants, which sometimes contain talc or other minerals with contamination potential, a wax-starch base is chemically simpler and less prone to irritation. It is less feature-heavy than spray or gel formats, which often contain propellants or volatile solvents.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent the wax base from softening or separating, especially in summer climates. Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin; the starch and wax combination is effective without heavy layering. Replace when the stick has worn down or if the texture becomes grainy or discolored, typically every 2-3 months with daily use. If you experience skin irritation, discontinue and check the fragrance compound list on the package, as citrus and herbal oils can trigger sensitivity in some users.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Baxter of California has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.