PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Baxter of California Deodorant

Baxter of California · Deodorant

Baxter of California Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern; standard deodorant with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyAluminum-based deodorant with no documented hazards beyond standard cosmetic safety; brand transparency is minimal but product poses no known elevated risk.

This traditional stick formula lacks waterproofing, nonstick coatings, and stain-resistance treatments, which are the primary PFAS-use categories. The brand makes no public PFAS disclosures.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Aluminum-based stick deodorant with typical cosmetic formulants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitization

Baxter of California deodorants contain fragrance blends, which may include common allergens (limonene, linalool, eugenol) not itemized on packaging. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or contact dermatitis should patch test or choose unscented alternatives.

70/ 100
⚠️

Contact dermatitis or skin irritation from formulation

As with any antiperspirant deodorant, individuals with sensitive skin may experience localized irritation, particularly in skin folds or after shaving. This is product-class risk, not specific to Baxter, and is typically mild and self-resolving.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Aluminum absorption and systemic exposure

No scientific evidence links topical aluminum deodorant use to systemic health effects at typical application rates. The FDA recognizes aluminum antiperspirants as safe for over-the-counter use; transdermal absorption is minimal.

95/ 100

Talc contamination in powder formulations

Baxter of California's standard deodorant is a stick (not powder), so talc exposure is not applicable to this product. Talc contamination concerns do not apply.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or documented contamination with lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals have been reported for this product. Cosmetic colorants and preservatives in deodorants are FDA-regulated; no specific safety flag exists for Baxter's formulation.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Baxter of California deodorant is an aluminum-based stick formula, typical of conventional antiperspirant deodorants. Aluminum salts (usually aluminum chlorohydrate or similar complexes) are the active antiperspirant agent; the stick base typically contains waxes, emollients, and fragrance. At the concentrations used in deodorants (roughly 15-25% aluminum), the material is considered safe for topical use by the FDA and does not breach any established hazard thresholds for this category.

The brand's record and disclosure

Baxter of California does not publish ingredient transparency reports, safety certifications, or formulation disclosures beyond standard product labels. The brand has no recorded recalls or safety controversies specific to this deodorant line. No independent third-party certifications (e.g., EWG verification, dermatologist testing claims) are prominently marketed, which is typical for mid-tier personal care brands.

How it compares in its category

This product is positioned as a conventional aluminum antiperspirant, placing it in the mainstream deodorant category. Alternatives include aluminum-free sticks (potassium alum, baking soda bases), natural brands with third-party certification, and prescription-strength antiperspirants. Baxter's formulation offers no documented advantage or disadvantage relative to comparable aluminum stick deodorants from brands like Old Spice, Gillette, or store-label equivalents.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent softening or separation of the stick formula. Replace when depleted or if fragrance becomes noticeably altered (sign of oxidation). Apply to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation. Discontinue if localized rash, excessive irritation, or sensitivity develops and consult a dermatologist if symptoms persist; this is standard practice for any topical antiperspirant.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Baxter of California has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.