PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
The Class Deodorant

Bonnie & Clyde · Deodorant

The Class Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern for standard deodorant, but no public brand assurance.

Verdict: BuyStandard deodorant formula with no established safety concerns; PFAS baseline acceptable; brand transparency limited but not disqualifying.

The Class Deodorant uses a standard wax and starch base without water-resistant or grease-resistant coatings that commonly contain PFAS. Bonnie & Clyde has not disclosed PFAS status for this product.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Deodorant base (presumed wax, starch, oil)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and essential oils

The Class uses fragrance components (specific ingredients not fully disclosed on brand website). Common deodorant fragrances and botanical oils can trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in 5-15% of users; full ingredient list needed to assess specific risk.

70/ 100

Skin irritation from wax sensitivity or rancidity over time

Wax-based sticks can harbor bacterial growth if left damp or stored in humid conditions, and oils may oxidize over months, causing rancid odor or mild irritation. Proper storage (cool, dry place) and timely replacement mitigate this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or third-party testing data are publicly available for The Class. If the formulation includes iron oxides, mica, or plant-derived dyes for color, trace lead or cadmium is theoretically possible but unconfirmed for this brand; standard cosmetic regulations limit but do not eliminate this risk.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No preservative system is explicitly disclosed by the brand. Wax-based formulations typically require minimal preservation; if phenolic or urea-formaldehyde releasers are used, they are not indicated in publicly available materials.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Talc or talc-adjacent mineral contamination

The Class does not list talc in disclosed ingredients, reducing asbestos and ovarian cancer risk associated with talc-based deodorants. However, if the starch component is sourced from talc-mining regions without certification, trace contamination is theoretically possible but undocumented.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Class is a solid stick deodorant based on wax, starch, and oils, the conventional formulation for most natural and conventional brands. This base is chemically stable, non-volatile at skin temperature, and poses minimal inhalation risk compared to aerosol sprays. No synthetic polymers, silicones, or talc are publicly listed in the disclosed ingredients, which reduces several legacy safety concerns in this category.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bonnie & Clyde markets itself as a clean-beauty deodorant brand but has not published detailed safety certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, MADE SAFE) or third-party testing results on common allergens and heavy metals. The brand's silence on PFAS and ingredient sourcing limits consumer assurance, though no recalls or public safety incidents are on record. Lack of transparency is a caution flag rather than a confirmed hazard.

How it compares in its category

Solid-stick deodorants like this occupy a lower-risk position than aerosols (no propellant inhalation) and antiperspirant gels (which often carry aluminum salts). Among natural and indie brands, The Class sits in the mainstream safety profile, neither exceptional in disclosure nor flagged for quality issues. Comparable competitors (Kopari, Native, Meow Meow Tweet) often provide similar or slightly better ingredient transparency.

If you buy it

Apply a small amount to clean, dry underarm skin; the wax base will soften slightly with body heat but should not flake excessively if stored below 75°F. Replace when the stick is visibly depleted or shows significant hardening (typically 2-3 months with daily use). Discontinue if rash or irritation develops, as fragrance or botanical oils may trigger sensitivity in some users; patch test on inner arm first if prone to contact dermatitis.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 68% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bonnie & Clyde has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.