PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Brut Deodorant Stick Classic Fragrance 2.25 oz

Brut · Deodorant

Brut Deodorant Stick Classic Fragrance 2.25 oz

Excellent

Typical deodorant stick; no known PFAS risk, lower concern product.

Verdict: BuyBrut Classic is a conventional wax-based stick with no established safety red flags; low chemical complexity reduces hazard profile versus aerosol or gel formulations.

Brut stick deodorant contains standard wax and mineral bases without waterproofing or nonstick coatings that typically harbor PFAS. No public PFAS testing or claims available, but formulation type suggests lower inherent risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax, starch, and fragrance base; typical antiperspirant mineral compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Brut uses conventional fragrance blends that may include limonene, linalool, and other common allergenic compounds. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis may experience contact dermatitis; no specific allergen list is published by the brand.

70/ 100
🔩

Skin irritation from aluminum compounds

Aluminum salts (aluminum chlorohydrate or similar) are the active antiperspirant ingredient and can cause irritation, stinging, or contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. This is an inherent property of antiperspirant chemistry, not a manufacturing defect specific to Brut.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence that Brut Classic contains formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in published ingredient disclosures. Solid wax formulations typically use simpler preservation methods.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Antiperspirant aluminum salts are regulated food-grade materials; no known contamination with lead, cadmium, or arsenic reported in mass-market stick deodorants. Any colorants in the base are cosmetic-grade and not a known source of concern for this product class.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Talc contamination

Brut Classic uses starch rather than talc as a dry-texture agent, avoiding asbestos and respirable particle risks associated with talc powder formulations.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Brut Classic Deodorant is a solid stick formulation based on wax, starch, and fragrance compounds, with typical antiperspirant actives (likely aluminum salts). This wax-starch matrix is chemically stable at room temperature and does not require solvents or propellants that introduce volatile organic compounds. The solid form means no spray inhalation risk and minimal leaching concerns compared to liquid or gel formats. Fragrance is the most variable component; Brut uses conventional fragrance blends rather than isolated essential oils, which may contain more complex chemical mixtures.

The brand's record and disclosure

Brut (owned by Coty Inc.) does not publish detailed ingredient safety disclosures or third-party certifications (no EWG Verified, cruelty-free, or clean beauty badges on record). The brand has no widely documented safety recalls or regulatory actions specific to this deodorant stick. Coty as a parent company has faced historical scrutiny over fragrance transparency but Brut itself carries no established controversy in independent safety literature. Ingredient listing on the package follows FDA cosmetic labeling rules; full INCI names are available but fragrance components remain proprietary.

How it compares in its category

Brut Classic sits in the mainstream mass-market deodorant segment alongside brands like Old Spice and Degree. It avoids some hazards present in aerosol formulations (propellant inhalation) and gel-based antiperspirants (plasticizer leaching from packaging). Compared to aluminum-free alternatives, it contains standard antiperspirant minerals, which are the subject of ongoing (but not conclusive) research into systemic aluminum exposure. As a fragrance-forward product, it contains more synthetic aroma compounds than unscented or essential-oil-heavy competitors, increasing theoretical fragrance allergen exposure.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry underarm skin; avoid broken skin to prevent irritation. Store below 77°F (25°C) to prevent stick warping or separation. Replace every 3-4 months or when consistency visibly degrades. If rash, burning, or allergic reaction occurs, discontinue and rinse thoroughly; contact dermatologist if symptoms persist. Do not ingest; keep away from eyes and small children. This product is not a substitute for medical antiperspirant if you have hyperhidrosis.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Brut has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.