PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Burt's Bees Natural Nourishing Mascara

Burt's Bees · Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees Natural Nourishing Mascara

Poor

Lower concern than synthetic waterproof cosmetics; no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict: SkipWax-based formula with lower synthetic waterproofing risk; minimal established hazards; brand transparency modest but no recalls on record.

This product uses plant-based waxes and oils rather than silicones, reducing typical PFAS risk. Burt's Bees makes no PFAS disclosure or third-party verification available.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Wax, oils, and pigments (waterproof mascara base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (processing contaminant)

Wax-and-oil mascaras are lower-risk than synthetic polymers for 1,4-dioxane, but Burt's Bees has not disclosed whether ethoxylated emulsifiers (which can carry trace dioxane) are used in the formulation.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination (mascara brush)

Wax-based formulas with minimal synthetic preservatives may have shorter shelf-life and higher bacterial colonization risk post-opening than synthetic alternatives. No preservative system is listed on packaging, increasing risk if kept beyond 3 months.

20/ 100
⚠️

Eye irritation from formula or removal difficulty

Wax mascaras can flake and require vigorous removal, which increases mechanical irritation to the eye and lash line. Sensitivity reports for this specific product are not documented, but the wax base is inherently less film-forming than synthetic polymers and may migrate into tear film.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

Burt's Bees does not publish assay data for this product. Iron oxide and mica pigments are generally safe when cosmetic-grade, but no third-party verification is available for this specific mascara batch.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Fragrance allergens

Product is unscented or lightly scented; no known fragrance allergen complaints on record. However, natural fragrance components (if present) are not itemized in public disclosure.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Burt's Bees Natural Nourishing Mascara uses a wax, oil, and pigment base rather than synthetic polymers or silicones typical of conventional waterproof mascaras. Wax and plant oils (such as jojoba or beeswax) are less likely to accumulate in the eye or cause irritation compared to acrylate copolymers or dimethicone-heavy formulas. The waterproofing effect relies on hydrophobic wax coating rather than fluorinated compounds, reducing certain chemical exposure routes. Pigments used in mascaras are typically iron oxides, mica, or approved colorants; Burt's Bees does not disclose specific pigment sourcing or heavy-metal testing on this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Burt's Bees positions itself as natural and emphasizes ingredient lists, but does not publish third-party safety certifications, heavy-metal assays, or microbe testing reports for this mascara. The brand has no documented FDA safety recalls specific to this product. The company's parent (Clorox) maintains general cosmetics compliance but Burt's Bees mascara lacks transparency on contaminant screening (e.g., lead in pigments, 1,4-dioxane in processing). No independent testing of this specific product has been published in consumer databases.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof mascaras typically fall into two camps: synthetic polymer-based (higher microplastic and bioaccumulation risk) and wax-based (lower synthetic load, easier removal, less eye irritation). Burt's Bees sits in the lower-risk segment because wax formulas are simpler and more biodegradable. However, it lacks the regulatory transparency of clinical-grade or hypoallergenic brands that publish patch-test and heavy-metal data. Comparable natural alternatives (e.g., RMS Beauty, Kosas) similarly avoid disclosure but are marketed with similar positioning.

If you buy it

Remove with gentle oil-based cleanser to avoid tugging on lashes and flaking. Do not store in direct heat or sunlight, as wax formulas can separate or degrade. Replace every 2 to 3 months after opening to prevent bacterial colonization (mascara brush is a common contamination vector). If you experience eye redness, irritation, or crusting, discontinue use; no preservative system is listed, so shelf-life after opening is shorter than synthetic alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Burt's Bees has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.