PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Clinique High Impact Mascara

Clinique · Waterproof Mascara

Clinique High Impact Mascara

Poor

Skip until Clinique discloses waterproof chemistry.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof mascara with undisclosed PFAS-likely chemistry and standard cosmetic formulation risks; acceptable only with full ingredient transparency from Clinique.

This waterproof mascara formula typically relies on PFAS-based film-formers to repel water. Clinique offers no PFAS disclosure or third-party verification.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

wax, film-formers, polymers (waterproofing agents unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane or related ether contaminants

Waterproof film-formers and emulsifiers in mascaras can harbor trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Clinique does not publish 1,4-dioxane testing or limits, which is standard industry practice; presence is unconfirmed but possible in any wax-polymer waterproof mascara.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen load

Clinique High Impact contains fragrance compounds (not individually named on typical retail labels). Mascara sits on eyelids for hours; fragrance contact dermatitis and eye irritation are documented reactions, particularly in sensitive individuals. The brand does not specify fragrance-free versions of this line.

45/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial colonization in wet mascara

All mascara formulas, including waterproof wax-based types, are high-risk for bacterial and fungal growth when wet or left open. This is a use and storage issue, not a Clinique-specific flaw, but waterproof formulas are thicker and harder to clean from the brush, increasing contamination risk.

20/ 100
⚠️

Polymer film accumulation and lash damage

Waterproof polymer coatings require aggressive removal; repeated incomplete removal can cause lash brittleness and loss over months. This is a wear-and-tear hazard inherent to the waterproof class, not Clinique-specific, but High Impact's heavy-coverage formula increases removal difficulty.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

FDA-approved colorants in mascara are heavily regulated; no recalls or contamination reports exist for Clinique mascara pigments. Risk is low but inherent to all synthetic pigmented cosmetics applied near eyes. Clinique does not provide heavy metal testing data.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Clinique High Impact Mascara uses wax, film-forming polymers, and unspecified waterproofing agents typical of waterproof formulations. The waterproofing mechanism in most waterproof mascaras relies on silicones or fluorinated compounds (Teflon-type coating-adjacent polymers), though Clinique has not publicly detailed which class they use. Wax-based mascaras generally pose lower volatility risks than solvent-heavy formulas, but the polymer system and any synthetic fragrance components determine overall safety profile. Without ingredient-level disclosure of the waterproof film-former, precise hazard assessment is incomplete.

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique is owned by Estee Lauder and does publish an ingredient list online, but does not voluntarily disclose PFAS presence or absence in waterproof products. The brand has not faced major public safety recalls for mascara, but has faced minor reformulations for stability. Clinique markets itself as dermatologist-tested and hypoallergenic, which relates to skin irritation rather than systemic hazards. Their silence on fluorinated waterproofing agents is consistent with industry-wide opacity on this issue.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof mascaras (Maybelline, L'Oreal, MAC) use similar wax-polymer bases and do not disclose PFAS status. Oil-based removers are standard for this class, suggesting high film tenacity. Clinique High Impact is mid-range priced and positions itself as a hybrid performance product; competitor transparency is equally poor. Alcohol-free, fragrance-light mascaras from smaller brands (e.g., Beautycounter) explicitly avoid fluorinated compounds, making them more traceable alternatives.

If you buy it

Use dedicated oil-based or wax-dissolving makeup remover; water alone will not remove waterproof film reliably. Do not sleep in mascara; remove nightly to prevent lash brittleness and eye irritation over weeks of use. Replace mascara every 3 months or sooner if clumping or odor develops, as mascara is a high-bacterial-growth-risk product stored near eyes. Discontinue immediately if redness, swelling, or persistent itching occurs, and consult an ophthalmologist if symptoms persist.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.