Antiperspirant Hand Lotion
Low PFAS risk; cosmetic lotion without waterproofing, skip for other concerns.
Carpe's antiperspirant hand lotion contains common cosmetic ingredients with no known PFAS use. Brand makes no PFAS claims; standard formulations pose lower concern than waterproof or grease-resistant products.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
water-based lotion with glycerin, plant extracts
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Antiperspirant Hand Lotion is made of, ingredients and materials
Carpe Antiperspirant Hand Lotion is a water-based formulation built around glycerin and plant extracts, with no reported synthetic polymers, silicones, or occlusive film-forming agents typical of antiperspirant creams. Glycerin is a humectant that draws moisture into skin; plant extracts add conditioning without documented irritation risk. The antiperspirant function likely comes from aluminum salts or similar salts (not disclosed in public materials reviewed), which are standard in dermal antiperspirants and are not classified as a hazard concern at cosmetic concentrations.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Plant extracts and fragrances in hand lotions can trigger contact allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Carpe's specific fragrance or extract composition is not detailed in public sources; patch testing is recommended for those with known fragrance sensitivity.
1,4-dioxane (process contaminant in ethoxylated ingredients)
If plant extracts or emulsifiers in the lotion include ethoxylated compounds, trace 1,4-dioxane may be present as an unintended byproduct. Public ingredient disclosure does not confirm presence; risk is low in water-based lotions but not eliminated without third-party testing.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) are disclosed in publicly available ingredient lists. Glycerin-rich, water-based formulas typically use gentler preservatives; however, full preservative agent is not confirmed in accessible sources.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Hand lotion is not typically pigmented; this product has no reported colorants or lakes. No heavy metal contamination concerns are documented for Carpe or its category peers in this format.
Source, FDA ↗Talc contamination
This is a lotion, not a powder; talc is not an ingredient in this product type. No asbestos contamination risk applies.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Carpe does not publish extensive safety disclosures or third-party certifications (such as EWG Verified or dermatological testing claims) in widely available sources. The brand has no established recalls or safety controversies on record. Ingredient transparency appears standard for the category; full ingredient lists are typically available on packaging or retailer sites. No known advocacy or public stance on PFAS avoidance has been documented, but the water-based lotion format itself carries low likelihood of intentional PFAS inclusion.
How it compares in its category
Hand antiperspirant lotions in this category typically trade off efficacy for skin comfort; Carpe positions on the gentler end without heavy occlusive waxes or silicone film. Competing products (e.g., conventional hand creams with aluminum chlorohydrate) often use thicker bases or added silicones, which present marginally higher potential for residue buildup but not hazard elevation. This lotion's water-forward design is broadly consistent with modern hand-care formulation and does not introduce category-atypical ingredients.
If you buy it
Store the lotion at room temperature and avoid direct heat or sunlight; glycerin-based formulas are stable and do not require special conditions. Apply to clean, dry hands before activities where perspiration control is desired (typically palms and fingers). Discontinue use if skin irritation, rash, or sensitization develops. No special replacement or maintenance is needed; discard after 12-24 months if product separates, discolors, or develops odor, indicating microbial growth or formula breakdown.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Carpe has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Antiperspirant Hand Lotion?
- mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
- cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Beeswax purity and contamination
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More deodorant grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.