PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall25/ 100Poor

Carpe · Deodorant

Antiperspirant Lotion Lavender Citrus

Good

Insufficient disclosure; Carpe does not address PFAS in formulation.

Verdict · SkipCarpe antiperspirant lotion lacks full ingredient transparency and does not disclose PFAS status; typical hazard concerns are manageable with informed use.

Carpe's antiperspirant lotion lacks public PFAS claims or third-party verification. No lab data or disclosed ingredient transparency available to assess risk.

The better-graded swap

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary blend (not fully disclosed)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Antiperspirant Lotion Lavender Citrus is made of, ingredients and materials

Carpe markets this as a proprietary blend without publishing a complete ingredient list, which limits independent assessment of specific chemical content. Antiperspirant lotions typically contain aluminum salts (active ingredient) combined with emulsifiers, humectants, and fragrance compounds. The lavender-citrus scent profile suggests added fragrance oils or synthetic aroma chemicals, which may include allergens or irritants. Without full disclosure, the presence of common preservatives (like formaldehyde releasers or parabens) and potential 1,4-dioxane contamination in fragrance or emulsifiers cannot be ruled out.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Lavender and citrus fragrance blends often include synthetic aroma chemicals and allergens (limonene, linalool, citral) not always listed individually. Contact dermatitis and sensitization are reported concerns with scented antiperspirants, particularly in the axilla where skin is occluded and permeable.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination in emulsifiers or fragrance

This byproduct of ethoxylated surfactants and fragrance oils is not intentionally added but can be present at trace levels in typical cosmetic formulations. Without independent testing data published by Carpe, presence cannot be confirmed or ruled out.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Common preservatives in lotion-based cosmetics (e.g., diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea) release trace formaldehyde over product lifetime. Carpe does not publicly disclose preservative system, so this cannot be assessed from available information.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum salt irritation or systemic absorption

Topical aluminum antiperspirants are approved by the FDA but localized irritation, contact sensitization, and theoretical systemic absorption concerns have been documented in dermatological literature. Risk is individual; persons with atopic dermatitis or aluminum sensitivities should consult a dermatologist before use.

45/ 100
🏷️

Lack of ingredient transparency limiting risk assessment

Proprietary formulation claims without full ingredient disclosure prevent independent verification of hazard presence. This practice is increasingly recognized as a limitation in consumer safety decision-making within the cosmetics category.

20/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Carpe does not publicly address PFAS in its formulation and does not appear to have pursued third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Clean Beauty Seal) that would increase transparency. The brand markets itself as a dermatology-focused antiperspirant but has not published ingredient sourcing, manufacturing standards, or toxicology summaries typical of premium personal care brands. No established recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product as of available data.

How it compares in its category

Antiperspirant lotions are generally lower-risk than aerosol or powder formulations (which pose inhalation hazards). Carpe's lotion form avoids talc-related concerns and Teflon-type coating fume risks associated with spray antiperspirants. However, without ingredient transparency, it is difficult to assess whether it meets disclosure standards of brands that publish full ingredient lists and third-party testing. Most competitors in the premium dermatology space do disclose allergens and fragrance components.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin only; aluminum salts can cause irritation on compromised skin or immediately after shaving. Discontinue use if localized redness, burning, or allergic reaction (common with synthetic fragrances) develops. Replace if the product separates, thickens abnormally, or develops an off smell, which may indicate preservative failure. Given the proprietary formulation, patch test on a small area before regular use, especially if you have sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivities.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Carpe has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Antiperspirant Lotion Lavender Citrus?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Each & Every The Mini Edit

Each & Every

The Mini Edit

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ EWG Verified
  • cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

Primally Pure

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Beeswax purity and contamination

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More deodorant grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.