PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall16/ 100Bad
Sheer Mineral Face Liquid Sunscreen SPF 50

· Sunscreen

Sheer Mineral Face Liquid Sunscreen SPF 50

Poor

Lower concern overall, though Cetaphil has not publicly tested for PFAS.

Verdict: SkipMineral sunscreen with zinc oxide/titanium dioxide is safer than chemical alternatives; no established hazards beyond typical category concerns; PFAS score modest but not disqualifying for topical use.

Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide pose lower PFAS risk than chemical filters. Water resistance sometimes involves fluorinated additives, but Cetaphil makes no PFAS claim either way.

The safe swap

Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin

Raw Elements

Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide) with water-resistant formula

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Contact sensitization or irritation from emulsifiers/fragrance

Cetaphil markets this as hypoallergenic and fragrance-free, which reduces risk compared to fragranced sunscreens. Individual sensitivity to silicones or glycerin is rare but possible; if burning or rash develops after application, discontinue and patch-test on forearm.

70/ 100
🏷️

Water-resistance claim durability and reapplication compliance

Water-resistant labels require reapplication; user error in skipping reapplication after swimming or sweating is the primary failure mode, not product hazard. Follow label instructions for every-two-hour reapplication to maintain SPF efficacy.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Pharmaceutical-grade zinc oxide and titanium dioxide used in sunscreens are refined to remove cadmium and lead; no recalls or contamination reports on record for Cetaphil mineral sunscreen. Skin exposure to topical mineral actives at normal usage volumes poses negligible systemic risk.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Nano-particle inhalation risk

Cetaphil specifies non-nano particle size for this formulation. Spray sunscreens carry inhalation risk; this is a liquid meant for hand application to face, which eliminates airborne exposure concern.

95/ 100

Photostability and UV filter degradation

Mineral sunscreens (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide) are photostable and do not degrade when exposed to UV light. No time-dependent loss of protection is documented for this product category under normal storage.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Cetaphil Sheer Mineral Face Liquid Sunscreen uses zinc oxide and titanium dioxide as UV filters, which sit on the skin surface rather than absorbing into it. These are non-nano mineral actives, meaning larger particle size that stays external. The water-resistant formula likely contains silicones, emulsifiers, and glycerin to maintain stability and spreadability; these are low-toxicity delivery agents. Mineral sunscreens as a category have a long safety track record because the active ingredients don't penetrate skin or metabolize systemically.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cetaphil is owned by Galderma and markets itself as dermatologist-recommended with emphasis on sensitive-skin formulation. The brand has not published comprehensive ingredient testing results or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG verification, reef-safe confirmation). No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this sunscreen are on record. Cetaphil's silence on PFAS testing is consistent with many mainstream sunscreen makers who have not voluntarily disclosed PFAS screening data.

How it compares in its category

Mineral sunscreens are generally considered safer than chemical UV absorbers (oxybenzone, avobenzone) because they rely on physical blocking rather than systemic absorption. Cetaphil's formulation is positioned as lightweight and non-greasy compared to traditional mineral pastes, which is competitive within the premium mineral segment. The SPF 50 and water-resistant claim align with mainstream UV protection standards. Brands like Blue Lizard and Badger offer similar mineral actives with stronger environmental/toxicity transparency, while mass-market alternatives like Coppertone often use chemical absorbers.

If you buy it

Apply generously (at least 1/4 teaspoon for face) and reapply every two hours or after water exposure; mineral sunscreens do not degrade significantly in sunlight so shelf life is stable if stored cool and dry. Store below 25C and discard if separated or discolored. The liquid formulation may separate over time; shake before use. Do not use if seal is broken or if product has been in direct heat for extended periods.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.