PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara

Clinique · Waterproof Mascara

Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara

Poor

Waterproof mascara ingredient list lacks PFAS disclosure. Limited public data.

Verdict: SkipClinique High Impact lacks PFAS transparency and disclosed formulation details. Other mascara hazards appear standard; brand has no major safety recalls on record.

Clinique does not disclose waterproofing chemistry for this mascara. Waterproof cosmetics sometimes use PFAS, but no lab results or brand transparency available.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

pigments, resins, waxes, waterproofing agents unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Iron oxides and titanium dioxide in mascaras are generally recognized as safe colorants, but independent testing of Clinique High Impact pigment batches is not publicly available. Minor contamination during mining or manufacturing is possible though uncommon in regulated US cosmetics.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

Dioxane is a secondary contaminant in cosmetics with ethoxyethanol or polyethylene glycol derivatives. Clinique does not publish third-party testing for dioxane. The risk is low to trace in regulated US prestige cosmetics but cannot be excluded without lab analysis.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

This product lists fragrance as an ingredient. Specific allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) are not itemized on packaging. Fragrance mixes can trigger contact dermatitis or eye irritation in sensitive individuals, particularly near the eye area.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth if unmaintained

All mascaras, especially waterproof formulas, accumulate bacteria if not replaced regularly or if tube is left open. The waterproof formulation may harbor moisture and microbes longer than non-waterproof products due to polymer film density.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of formaldehyde releasers in this product. Clinique does not list these in disclosed preservatives, and waterproof mascaras typically use phenoxyethanol or paraben systems instead. However, full preservative profile is not detailed publicly.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara contains pigments (iron oxides, likely titanium dioxide), film-forming resins (typically acrylates or silicones), waxes, and unspecified waterproofing agents. The waterproof claim suggests synthetic polymers or silicones that resist water breakdown; formulation details are not publicly disclosed on the label or brand website. Without ingredient transparency, independent assessment of heavy metal content in pigments or presence of problematic binders is limited.

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique (Estee Lauder Companies) does not publicly disclose PFAS use in mascaras and has not signed commitments to eliminate PFAS in personal care products. The brand has no major FDA safety recalls for mascara products in recent public records. Clinique provides a basic ingredient list but does not offer detailed safety certifications (e.g., clean beauty seals, heavy metal testing) for mascaras on marketing materials.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof mascaras as a category carry inherent uncertainty around waterproofing polymer identity and PFAS risk. Clinique's disclosure stance is typical for mainstream prestige cosmetics but lags behind certified clean brands that publish third-party testing or commit to PFAS-free formulation. Budget and mid-tier waterproof mascaras show similar opacity; premium alternatives like Thrive Causemetics disclose PFAS absence more explicitly.

If you buy it

Apply only to eyelashes and lids; avoid contact with eyes. Replace mascara every 3 months or sooner if clumping or odor develops to prevent bacterial growth. Remove with gentle, oil-based makeup remover to avoid lash damage and residue buildup. If eyes become irritated, discontinue and consult an eye care professional; waterproof formulas are harder to remove completely and may accumulate.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.