PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara - 8ml/0.28oz, Black

Clinique · Waterproof Mascara

Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara - 8ml/0.28oz, Black

Poor

Waterproof mascara with undisclosed coating. PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict: SkipUndisclosed waterproofing agents raise PFAS uncertainty; otherwise typical mascara with standard cosmetic hazard profile. Use with awareness of removal practices.

Clinique does not publicly disclose PFAS or waterproofing chemistry. Waterproof mascaras often use fluorinated compounds, but brand provides no verification either way.

The safe swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polymeric film, wax, and pigment blend with waterproofing agents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Clinique does not disclose waterproofing chemistry; common water-resistant mascaras use dimethicone (safe) but some brands use Teflon-family coating (PFAS-type compounds). Without testing or certification, PFAS presence cannot be ruled in or out for this specific product.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Preservatives and 1,4-dioxane

Clinique does not list preservative details on public ingredient statements. Waterproof mascaras often use glyceryl stearate and emulsifier blends that may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct; Estee Lauder products have occasionally reported dioxane at non-regulatory-violation levels in third-party testing.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitization

Clinique High Impact formulations typically include fragrance or fragrance-masking agents. Contact dermatitis and eye irritation from mascara fragrance are well-documented; sensitive individuals should patch-test or choose fragrance-free waterproof alternatives.

45/ 100
🍂

Polymeric film durability and microflaking

Waterproof mascaras form a removable film coating; over time or with mechanical stress (rubbing, heat), this coating can flake, potentially introducing microscopic particles into the eye. Replacement every 3 months mitigates this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Iron oxides (synthetic) are FDA-approved colorants and generally well-controlled in cosmetic-grade products. No recalls or reports of lead or cadmium contamination in Clinique mascaras are on record; this hazard is standard risk for any pigmented mascara, not elevated for this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Clinique High Impact Waterproof Mascara uses a polymeric film base (likely acrylates or silicones) combined with waxes and iron oxide pigments, sealed with proprietary waterproofing agents that Clinique does not publicly disclose. The waterproofing mechanism is the critical unknown: traditional water-resistant mascaras use silicone or dimethicone barriers, but some brands have incorporated fluorinated compounds (PFAS-type coatings) to achieve superior water shedding. Without ingredient transparency, the specific waterproofing chemistry cannot be confirmed from public sources.

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique (owned by Estee Lauder) maintains a general dermatologist-tested and hypoallergenic marketing stance but does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing, manufacturing certifications, or PFAS testing policies. The brand has not issued public statements on PFAS avoidance or fluorinated compound exclusion in waterproof products. No major recalls or controversies specific to this mascara formulation are on record, though Estee Lauder has faced broader scrutiny over fragrance and preservative transparency in recent years.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof mascaras across the market segment typically carry similar undisclosed waterproofing risks; Clinique sits in the mid-to-premium tier where ingredient opacity is common. Brands like Maybelline and L'Oreal similarly do not disclose PFAS testing, while some premium and indie brands (e.g., Sephora Collection, Flower Beauty) have begun voluntary PFAS-free claims. Clinical-grade mascaras often prioritize removal ease and minimal irritation over cost-competitive waterproofing, making this product less risky than ultra-budget waterproof alternatives in terms of coating durability and eye irritation, but PFAS risk remains unquantified.

If you buy it

Remove with gentle, oil-based or micellar cleansers designed for waterproof makeup to minimize eye trauma and allow the polymeric film to fully release. Do not apply heat directly to the eye area or use excessively hot water for removal, as heat can alter the coating chemistry and increase irritant exposure. Replace every 3 months or immediately if clumping, separation, or odor changes occur, as degraded mascara polymers can flake into the eye. If eye irritation develops (redness, watering, grittiness), discontinue use and switch to a simpler, non-waterproof formula until sensitivity resolves.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Mascara

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth and contamination in wax formula

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; conventional non-waterproof formula with no identified PFAS drivers.

Risky category by default

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.