Daily SPF Mineral Sunscreen
Mineral sunscreen powders lower concern, no PFAS-typical uses detected.
Mineral sunscreens with zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are lower concern for PFAS. Cocokind makes no PFAS disclosure, but product category and known ingredients suggest minimal PFAS risk.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Daily SPF Mineral Sunscreen is made of, ingredients and materials
Cocokind Daily SPF Mineral Sunscreen uses zinc oxide and titanium dioxide as UV filters, both inorganic minerals that sit on skin rather than absorb into it. These are the two FDA-approved mineral UV blockers and do not metabolize systemically, reducing exposure to synthetic chemical filters. The formulation avoids oxybenzone, avobenzone, and other organic filters that carry higher absorption and endocrine-activity concerns.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens and 1,4-dioxane
If the formulation includes fragrance compounds, synthetic fragrances can harbor 1,4-dioxane as a contaminant or contain undisclosed allergens; however, Cocokind emphasizes clean ingredient sourcing. Review full ingredient list for fragrance or parfum declarations.
Skin irritation from inorganic mineral filters
Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are non-toxic but can cause localized irritation, sensitivity, or allergic contact dermatitis in a small percentage of users, particularly on sensitive or eczema-prone skin. This is a known minor risk with mineral sunscreens and not specific to Cocokind.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Lead
Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are not typical repositories for heavy metal contamination when sourced from established suppliers. No recalls or test reports have documented lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Cocokind mineral sunscreen formulations.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Mineral sunscreens do not typically employ formaldehyde-releasing preservatives; Cocokind's ingredient transparency does not indicate such compounds are used in this product.
Source, ATSDR ↗Talc contamination
Cocokind does not list talc as an ingredient in this mineral sunscreen. Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide do not inherently carry talc contamination risk.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Cocokind maintains a transparency-focused positioning and has published ingredient lists without known recalls or regulatory actions in public databases. The brand does not explicitly address PFAS policy in available materials, though mineral sunscreen formulations are not typical sources of PFAS. No established controversies over heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or banned dyes have been documented for this line.
How it compares in its category
Mineral sunscreens are generally considered lower-concern than chemical sunscreens in cosmetic safety discourse because zinc oxide and titanium dioxide have longer safety histories and lower systemic absorption. Cocokind's formulation aligns with the mainstream shift toward mineral-only options; it sits in the same hazard profile as competitors like Badger, Blue Lizard, and Colorescience mineral variants. Some consumers report white cast or texture trade-offs with mineral formulas, but safety profile does not differ materially.
If you buy it
Apply generously and reapply every two hours or after water exposure; mineral filters require adequate thickness to be effective. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to preserve formula stability. Check the tube or container for separation, clumping, or off-odor before use; mineral suspensions can degrade over 12-24 months. Perform a patch test on inner arm first if you have sensitive or reactive skin, as titanium dioxide or zinc oxide can occasionally trigger irritation in susceptible individuals.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Cocokind has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Daily SPF Mineral Sunscreen?
- Mineral sunscreen, zinc oxide base
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- 1,4-dioxane (non-intentional contaminant from surfactants/emulsifiers)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide or titanium dioxide base)
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Synthetic fragrance allergens
More sunscreen grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.