PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Aluna Stick Deodorant

Crystal · Deodorant

Aluna Stick Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern; mineral salt deodorants rarely use PFAS.

Verdict: BuyMineral alum deodorant with low toxicity profile; no major hazards documented. Brand transparency absent but material class is inherently safer.

Aluna Stick Deodorant is formulated from mineral salts without synthetic coating, a product class with historically low PFAS risk. The brand makes no public statement about PFAS or ingredient sourcing.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

mineral salts (potassium alum or ammonium alum); no synthetic coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🧠

Lead

Potassium and ammonium alum are mined minerals and can contain trace heavy metal contaminants depending on source and refining. Crystal has not published third-party heavy metal testing data for this product. Risk is lower than synthetic additives but unverified.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation or allergic contact dermatitis

Pure mineral salt deodorants are generally well-tolerated, but occasional contact irritation has been anecdotally reported in sensitive individuals. No formal adverse event database entries are on record for this specific brand, but irritation risk exists with any topical product.

45/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

If the product contains added fragrance oils or essential oils, these can trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory irritation in sensitive users. Crystal markets both scented and unscented versions; fragrance ingredient lists are not consistently disclosed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc or talc-like mineral contaminants

Aluma Stick formulations typically do not include talc filler. However, if the product contains anti-caking agents or flow additives from the mining or processing stage, trace silicate minerals could be present. Brand does not detail secondary ingredients or processing aids.

95/ 100

Bacterial or mold growth in stick form

The mineral salt base and solid form inhibit microbial growth under normal storage. Risk is negligible if kept dry. No documented contamination incidents are on record for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Aluna Stick uses potassium alum or ammonium alum salts, naturally occurring mineral compounds that work by forming a protective layer on skin and inhibiting bacterial growth without blocking sweat. These salts have been used in personal care for decades and are not synthetic chemicals. Unlike antiperspirants, alum deodorants do not contain aluminum chlorohydrate or other aluminum compounds designed to plug sweat ducts, reducing systemic absorption risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Crystal (owned by Coty Inc.) has maintained a minimal public stance on ingredient sourcing and third-party testing for this product line. The brand does not highlight certifications such as EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or NSF standards on marketed materials. No significant safety recalls or regulatory actions are on record for this specific deodorant, but the brand's silence on manufacturing controls and heavy metal testing of mineral salts limits independent verification.

How it compares in its category

Mineral salt deodorants sit at the lower-toxicity end of the deodorant spectrum, avoiding synthetic preservatives, fragrance blends, and antiperspirant actives found in conventional stick formulas. They carry less risk of allergic contact dermatitis than products with added botanicals or essential oils. However, they are less effective for heavy perspiration than antiperspirants and may feel less cosmetically elegant than talc-containing or silicone-based alternatives.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent the stick from crumbling or absorbing moisture. The crystal will gradually wear down with use; replace when material becomes too small to apply comfortably, typically every 6-12 months depending on frequency. Wet skin slightly before application for even coverage and to reduce dust. If skin irritation or rash develops, discontinue use; pure mineral salts are well-tolerated but individual sensitivity is possible.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Crystal has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.