PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Degree Men

Degree · Deodorant

Degree Men

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for a basic deodorant formulation.

Verdict: BuyWater-based conventional deodorant with standard talc and fragrance profile; no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern supports selection.

Degree Men uses water-based ingredients with no PFAS-typical components like water-repellent or nonstick coatings. The brand makes no PFAS claims, and standard deodorants rarely contain PFAS unless marketed with water resistance.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water-based emulsion, starch, talc, fragrance

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
💨

Talc contamination and inhalation risk

Talc ore can be contaminated with asbestos depending on mining source. Industry-wide oversight has improved but no independent verification of Degree's specific talc supplier is publicly available. Inhalation during application poses minimal acute risk with stick format, but chronic inhalation is a documented concern for talc-containing products; skin application carries lower risk than powder inh

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen sensitivity

Degree Men contains fragrance components that are not fully itemized on labels (regulatory loophole allows 'fragrance' as proprietary blend). Common fragrance sensitizers in deodorants include limonene, linalool, and citral. Some users report contact dermatitis or sensitization with repeated use; risk is individual and cannot be assessed without full fragrance formula disclosure.

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from emulsion chemistry

Water-based emulsions require preservatives and stabilizers (not always fully disclosed) that can trigger irritation in sensitive skin. Starch can also promote localized bacterial growth if product is applied to damp or irritated skin, potentially worsening odor or causing rash.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

No antiperspirant efficacy; sweat feedback

This is a deodorant, not an antiperspirant, so it does not reduce sweat production. Users expecting sweat control may experience product failure and repeat application, increasing skin contact and potential irritation. This is a performance mismatch rather than a toxicity hazard but worth noting for informed choice.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Degree Men is a water-based emulsion deodorant combining starch, talc, and fragrance as its primary active and filler ingredients. Talc serves as an absorbent and anti-caking agent, while starch provides moisture control. This formulation is typical of mass-market stick deodorants and avoids aluminum-based antiperspirant chemistry, meaning it does not block sweat but rather masks odor and reduces moisture. The water-based emulsion format is inherently lower-risk than aerosol or powder formulations for inhalation exposure during application.

The brand's record and disclosure

Degree (owned by Unilever) maintains standard ingredient disclosure on packaging and online but does not publish detailed transparency reports or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny). The brand has no widely documented safety recalls or formal controversies specific to this product line. Unilever has faced litigation over talc-containing products from other brands but Degree Men itself has not been named in major talc-related claims, suggesting either lower risk profile or lower visibility. The brand's PFAS stance is silent, but the water-based formula and absence of water-resistant/sweat-lock marketing reduces likelihood of intentional PFAS inclusion.

How it compares in its category

Degree Men is mainstream and price-competitive. It sits in the middle of the deodorant spectrum: less minimalist than talc-free or certified-organic options (e.g., Routine, Schmidts) but more conventional and cheaper than aluminum antiperspirants (e.g., Gillette Clear Gel). Water-based stick deodorants like this are generally lower-risk than powder or spray formats for both inhalation and systemic exposure. It offers no premium certifications, making it indistinguishable from dozens of store-brand equivalents in terms of safety profile.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin in the morning or evening; allow to dry fully before dressing to avoid staining. Talc-based deodorants should not be inhaled directly during application; apply by rubbing with fingers or a brush rather than shaking powder near the face. Replace once empty (typically 2-3 months of daily use). If skin irritation develops, discontinue use. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent clumping; talc absorbs moisture and can degrade if exposed to high humidity or heat.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Degree has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.