PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Degree Shower Clean Antiperspirant Deodorant Twin Pack

Degree · Deodorant

Degree Shower Clean Antiperspirant Deodorant Twin Pack

Excellent

Lower concern for an antiperspirant that rarely needs PFAS coatings.

Verdict: BuyStandard antiperspirant with no documented safety recalls or hazard patterns; low-concern formulation typical of mainstream deodorants.

Degree Shower Clean requires no waterproofing, nonstick, or oil-resistance features that would trigger PFAS use. The brand makes no PFAS claims, and the category poses lower risk than treated apparel or coated cookware.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Typical antiperspirant/deodorant base, alcohols, starches, fragrance, aluminum compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Degree uses proprietary fragrance blends; undisclosed fragrance components may trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in susceptible individuals, particularly with regular daily use over months.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Aluminum systemic absorption

No established causal link between topical antiperspirant aluminum and neurotoxicity or breast cancer in peer-reviewed literature; regulatory agencies (FDA, EFSA) classify antiperspirant-strength aluminum as safe at typical use levels, though individual sensitivity varies.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Degree does not publicly list formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (such as imidazolidinyl urea) in readily available ingredient disclosures; no recalls or warnings specific to this product suggest their presence is unlikely.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

No published data confirms the presence of microplastics in Degree antiperspirants; starch-based and gel formulations in this category typically do not require added microbeads for function.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Degree antiperspirant deodorants are typically formulated with aluminum compounds (aluminum chlorohydrate or similar salts) as the active antiperspirant agent, combined with alcohol (usually ethanol or SD alcohol 40), starches for absorption, and proprietary fragrance blends. The alcohol acts as a solvent and preservative, while aluminum salts work by forming a plug in sweat ducts. This chemistry is well-established and represents the standard approach across major antiperspirant brands.

The brand's record and disclosure

Degree (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing or PFAS testing data for this product line, which is typical of major personal care brands that rely on regulatory compliance rather than proactive transparency. No significant safety recalls or health controversies specific to Degree antiperspirants appear in public safety databases. The brand markets toward mainstream consumers and follows standard cosmetic safety regulations without seeking premium certifications like EWG Verified or Dermatologist Beyond.

How it compares in its category

Degree's formulation is materially identical to most mass-market antiperspirants from competitors like Dove, Secret, or Old Spice in terms of core active ingredients and hazard profile. Brands marketing 'natural' or 'aluminum-free' deodorants (using baking soda or zinc compounds instead) occupy a distinct lower-aluminum niche; Degree does not compete there. Premium brands with certified transparency (like Schmidt's or Corpus Christi) offer higher disclosure but at higher cost and with different active agents.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin in the underarm area; avoid application to broken or freshly shaved skin as this can increase irritation risk. Store in a cool place away from direct heat (aluminum chlorohydrate can degrade under extreme temperatures, though unlikely in normal home use). Replace when visibly degraded or if irritation develops. If skin sensitization occurs, discontinue and consider switching to fragrance-free or lower-aluminum alternatives; sensitive individuals should do a patch test first.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Degree has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.