PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Degree Women's Sexy Intrigue Antiperspirant Deodorant

Degree · Deodorant

Degree Women's Sexy Intrigue Antiperspirant Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern with no PFAS-risk indicators, but Unilever makes no commitment.

Verdict: BuyStandard antiperspirant with no established safety red flags; aluminum and talc present but at typical category levels; Unilever transparency gap is minor concern.

This aluminum stick uses typical cosmetic bases with no water-resistant, nonstick, or stain-resistant treatments that would require PFAS. Unilever hasn't publicly confirmed PFAS absence, and no testing data exists.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Aluminum stick/emulsion base; talc, starch, wax

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum exposure (systemic absorption)

Aluminum chlorohydrate penetrates skin in small amounts; long-term systemic accumulation is studied but not conclusively linked to health harm in antiperspirant use. Risk is not elevated relative to other stick antiperspirants.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

The 'Sexy Intrigue' scent is a proprietary blend; full fragrance ingredient disclosure is not required by law on labels. Synthetic musks and essential oils in deodorant fragrances can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals, though incidence is low at typical use rates.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from alcohol or acid neutralizers

Antiperspirant emulsions often contain weak acids or alcohol to stabilize aluminum salts and control odor bacteria. Direct skin sensitivity is uncommon but more likely in persons with eczema or damaged skin barrier.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc contamination (asbestos risk)

No recalls or contamination reports on Degree antiperspirants. Talc mining can historically include asbestos trace; however, cosmetic-grade talc used in deodorants is routinely tested and regulated by FDA. Degree does not disclose talc source verification.

95/ 100

Microplastic shedding from stick matrix

Wax and starch binders in stick antiperspirants do not break into microplastics under normal use; the stick is not plastic-based and washes away with water. No evidence of microplastic risk from this product type.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Degree Women's Sexy Intrigue is a stick antiperspirant based on aluminum compounds (likely aluminum zirconium chlorohydrate or similar), mixed into an emulsion with talc, starch, and wax binders. Aluminum salts are the active ingredient blocking sweat ducts; talc is a mineral filler for texture and slip. The 'emulsion' base means water, oils, and thickeners are blended to create the spreadable formula. This is chemically typical for mass-market antiperspirants and carries the standard material profile of the category.

The brand's record and disclosure

Unilever (Degree's parent) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications for this line. No major recalls or regulatory actions specific to Degree antiperspirants are on record. The brand does not make public commitments on PFAS avoidance or talc sourcing verification, which leaves uncertainty about supply-chain screening but is not unusual for mainstream deodorant makers. Industry-wide, antiperspirant safety is relatively settled; Unilever products meet FDA labeling requirements.

How it compares in its category

Degree occupies the mid-market antiperspirant space alongside Dove, Secret, and Mitchum. All use similar aluminum salt + talc + wax formulas. Products marketed as talc-free (e.g., some natural brands) substitute with arrowroot or cornstarch; products claiming aluminum-free use zinc ricinoleate (less effective) or rely on botanical extracts (minimal efficacy data). Degree's formula is neither premium nor budget-conscious, and its safety profile is consistent with competitors at the same price point.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin; avoid broken skin or immediately post-shaving to minimize irritation. Do not expose the stick to heat above 40°C (104°F) as the emulsion may separate or degrade. Replace when the stick becomes noticeably crumbly or depleted; there is no specific expiry, but antiperspirant potency can drift after 2-3 years of storage. If you develop persistent rash or itching, discontinue and patch-test alternatives; some users react to fragrance or aluminum, though this is not specific to this product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Degree has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.