PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Dry Pocket Waterproof Floating Backpack Dry Bag

· Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Dry Pocket Waterproof Floating Backpack Dry Bag

Bad

Skip. Waterproof coating type undisclosed, PFAS risk.

Verdict · SkipPFAS coating type undisclosed; no other hazards reported for this material class, but waterproof durability and coating stability require monitoring.

Waterproof dry bags typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS. The brand provides no material or treatment details, and no independent verification is available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic fabric with waterproof coating, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Dry Pocket Waterproof Backpack Dry Bag is made of, ingredients and materials

This dry bag uses synthetic fabric (likely polyester or nylon) with an unspecified waterproof coating. The coating is the critical unknown, waterproofing in backpacks is typically achieved via polyurethane, silicone, or Teflon-family coating (Teflon-type coating/PFC) systems. Without manufacturer disclosure of which, you cannot rule out PFAS-based coatings. Synthetic base fabrics themselves (polyester, nylon) do not pose inherent leaching hazards under normal use, but the coating's chemical identity and degradation profile are opaque.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Waterproof coating composition (Teflon-type coating/PFC vs. polyurethane/silicone)

Coating type is not disclosed by manufacturer. If Teflon-family coating-based, PFAS exposure risk exists during manufacturing and potentially over product lifetime; this is handled separately in PFAS grading (20/100). Polyurethane or silicone coatings carry no known PFAS hazard.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Synthetic waterproof coatings degrade with UV exposure, heat, and mechanical wear. As coating breaks down, microscopic fragments may shed into water or skin contact; long-term inhalation or ingestion risk is low but not zero if coating flakes are handled or stored near food.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based finishing or resin reports exist for Dry Bag Co dry bags. Standard polyester and nylon backpack fabrics are not treated with formaldehyde unless explicitly dyed or flame-retarded; no evidence of either here.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or testing data link this brand or product to azo dye or heavy metal contamination. Synthetic fabrics in dry bags are typically low-risk for pigment hazards unless marketed as bright or specialty colors with unregulated dye suppliers.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester backpack fabrics may contain trace antimony (used as a catalyst in fiber production). At normal background levels in commercial textiles, this poses no established health hazard during wear or handling; no specific risk identified for Dry Bag Co.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Dry Bag Co has not publicly disclosed waterproof coating chemistry or provided PFAS testing/certification. No recalls or safety controversies are on record for this brand. The silence on coating composition is the primary concern; responsible waterproof gear manufacturers typically specify polyurethane, silicone, or state PFAS-free certification. The absence of such transparency is a red flag for informed purchasing, not necessarily proof of harm.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof backpacks routinely use PFC or Teflon-type coating coatings; many brands do not disclose this. Premium competitors (e.g., Ortlieb, SealLine) explicitly market PFAS-free or PFC-free alternatives using polyurethane or silicone, making their chemistry knowable at point of sale. Budget and mid-tier brands often remain silent, making Dry Bag Co typical of the opaque segment rather than an outlier. If PFAS avoidance is a priority, coated bags from brands with explicit certification may present lower concern.

If you buy it

Store the bag in a cool, dry place away from prolonged sunlight, which degrades synthetic coatings over time. Do not machine wash or expose to high heat, as these can accelerate coating breakdown and potential leaching. Inspect the seams and coated surfaces annually for cracks, peeling, or white residue; once compromised, water resistance fails and microscopic coating particles may shed. Hand wash with mild soap and air dry if needed; replace when coating visibly deteriorates (typically 3-5 years with normal use).

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Dry Pocket Waterproof Floating Backpack Dry Bag?

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
  • UV degradation and additive leaching

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

Patagonia

Disperser Roll Top Pack 40L

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Recycled polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.