PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
e.l.f. Sheer Slick Lipstick

ELF · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

e.l.f. Sheer Slick Lipstick

Excellent

Lipstick poses lower PFAS concern. No waterproofing treatment typical.

Verdict: BuyWax-oil lipstick with low PFAS concern, no major hazards documented; standard safety profile for budget cosmetics.

E.l.f. Sheer Slick Lipstick uses standard cosmetic waxes and pigments without waterproof or nonstick coatings that typically contain PFAS. No public disclosures or certifications, but formulation type suggests lower risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

wax, oils, pigments, standard cosmetic base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Iron oxides and mica used in colored lipsticks can carry trace contamination from mining or processing. e.l.f. does not publish heavy-metal limits or testing certificates for this product; FDA allows lead up to 10 ppm in lipstick, but individual batches are not labeled. Risk is low but not zero, especially for chronic daily use or pregnancy.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

e.l.f. does not disclose the preservative system for this product. If DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or similar formaldehyde-releasing agents are used (common in budget cosmetics), chronic lip contact could cause allergic sensitization, though acute toxicity is low.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed ingredients

e.l.f. Sheer Slick Lipstick contains fragrance as a labeled ingredient but does not itemize the 26+ fragrance components separately. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or histamine intolerance may experience lip irritation, swelling, or dermatitis; the brand's ingredient list does not guarantee absence of known allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool).

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100

1,4-dioxane (cosmetic impurity)

No 1,4-dioxane is intentionally added to this product type. Wax-oil formulas do not require the ethoxylated surfactants that produce dioxane as a byproduct, so contamination risk is negligible unless raw materials are sourced from suppliers with poor quality control.

95/ 100

Talc contamination (if talc is a filler)

Current e.l.f. formulations do not list talc as an ingredient; mica is used instead. Talc-free status reduces asbestos and respirable particle inhalation risk. No record of talc-related recalls for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

e.l.f. Sheer Slick Lipstick uses a wax-and-oil base (typical ingredients include carnauba or beeswax, castor oil, and synthetic esters) plus iron oxides and mica for color and shimmer. This formulation is chemically straightforward and does not require the synthetic film-formers or occlusive silicones that trigger PFAS concerns in waterproof or long-wear products. The absence of waterproofing polymers significantly reduces chemical complexity and associated contamination pathways.

The brand's record and disclosure

e.l.f. (Eyes Lips Face) does not publicly disclose detailed PFAS or heavy-metal testing results for individual products, and the brand has no established third-party cosmetic certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny). The company manufactures under standard FDA cosmetic compliance but has not published independent safety testing or ingredient traceability beyond regulatory minimums. No major product recalls or safety controversies specific to this lipstick line are on record.

How it compares in its category

Budget lipsticks in this price range typically share similar wax-oil bases; e.l.f. is not differentiated in hazard profile from drugstore alternatives like Maybelline or Revlon in the non-waterproof segment. Higher-end or specialty brands (e.g., RMS Beauty, Bite Beauty) may offer organic or more transparent sourcing, but available evidence does not show e.l.f. products to be categorically riskier. The main trade-off is disclosure transparency rather than ingredient safety.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to avoid ingestion of pigment particles; patch test if you have sensitive lips or history of cosmetic reactions. Store in cool, dry conditions (wax-based formulas soften above 80F). Replace every 12-18 months or if the texture becomes grainy or separated, as oxidation of oils can occur. Do not use if you are pregnant and concerned about lead ingestion (see lead hazard note below); if in doubt, request a full COA from the brand or contact FDA for batch-specific information.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
ELF has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.