PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Everlane Perform Legging

Everlane · Activewear

Everlane Perform Legging

Bad

Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or removes water treatment.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-treated moisture-wicking nylon/polyester blend with no brand disclosure on water-repellent coating chemistry; opaque sustainability claims undermine confidence in other material safety controls.

Perform legging uses water-repellent coating treatment typical of athletic wear, but Everlane does not publicly disclose the chemistry or PFAS status. Without third-party verification or brand transparency, the waterproofing raises concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Nylon/polyester blends are documented sources of microplastic pollution in wastewater, with highest release in first 5-10 washes. Everlane does not mention fiber-trapping measures or low-shed yarn technology.

Source: EPA
45/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

No certification (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) is stated, leaving dye chemistry and heavy metal content in pigments unverified. Polyester and nylon both accept synthetic dyes that may contain cadmium, lead, or azo compounds if not strictly controlled.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
💨

Moisture-wicking coating off-gassing and degradation

Polyurethane or silicone moisture-wicking treatments can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or break down over time when exposed to heat, sweat, or washing, releasing unclaimed finish residues into skin contact or laundry water.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No statement of formaldehyde-free processing is published; nylon/polyester blends may be treated with formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or stability during manufacturing and dyeing.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🏷️

Brand transparency and supply-chain verification gaps

Everlane's lack of published restricted substances list, third-party chemical testing, or supply-chain auditing for athletic wear suggests limited oversight of finishing and dyeing agents compared to certified competitors.

20/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Everlane Perform Leggings are a nylon/polyester blend treated with a moisture-wicking finish, most likely a polyurethane or silicone-based coating applied to manage sweat and dry time. The nylon component can shed microfibers during washing, particularly in the first 5-10 washes, and the synthetic polyester is petroleum-derived with its own manufacturing footprint. The 'performance' treatment is where the PFAS concern enters: most durable water/moisture repellent finishes on athletic wear historically used PFOA or GenX chemistry, though some brands have transitioned to fluorine-free alternatives that Everlane has not publicly detailed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Everlane markets itself as a transparency-focused brand but provides no specific disclosure of the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry, dyes, or finishing agents used in Perform leggings. The brand has faced criticism for vague sustainability claims and has not published a restricted substances list or pursued bluesign or OEKO-TEX certification for its athletic line, suggesting incomplete third-party chemical vetting. No major recalls or documented chemical violations tied to Everlane leggings are on public record, but the absence of disclosure itself is a red flag for a brand positioning transparency as its core value.

How it compares in its category

Everlane Perform leggings sit in the accessible athleisure segment alongside brands like Outdoor Voices and Girlfriend Collective, which similarly lack full transparency on PFAS use. Compared to certified alternatives (Patagonia, MATE the Label with bluesign or OEKO-TEX), Everlane offers lower price and brand cachet but sacrifices chemical clarity. Most mainstream nylon/polyester leggings share the microfiber shedding and potential PFAS exposure, making this product representative of a broader category problem rather than uniquely risky within its tier.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water inside a mesh laundry bag to reduce microfiber release and slow coating degradation. Avoid high heat in the dryer; lay flat or air dry to preserve the moisture-wicking treatment and minimize any volatile off-gassing from the finish. Replace after 1-2 years of regular use or when the fabric shows visible pilling, flaking, or loss of fit, as coating breakdown may release embedded treatment chemicals. Do not wash with other delicate items that could absorb shed microfibers or loose dyes.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Everlane has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Activewear

Fabletics Women's Oasis PureLuxe High-Waisted Pocketed Kick Flare

Fabletics

Women's Oasis PureLuxe High-Waisted Pocketed Kick Flare

polyester blend fabric, standard construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Unsupported fabric unlikely to carry high PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Fabletics Women's Live-In High-Waisted Leggings

Fabletics

Women's Live-In High-Waisted Leggings

Polyester/nylon blend, standard athletic apparel

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🧴

Phthalate plasticizers in elastane/spandex

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Standard athletic leggings without water-repellent coating.

Risky category by default

Fabletics Women's Define PowerHold High-Waisted 7/8 Leggings

Fabletics

Women's Define PowerHold High-Waisted 7/8 Leggings

polyester/nylon blend with elastic

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast quality

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Elastic degradation and allergenic contact

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; basic synthetic athletic wear without known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

More activewear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.