PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Waterproof Eyeliner (generic)

Generic · Cosmetics

Waterproof Eyeliner (generic)

Poor

Medium-high risk. Waterproofing chemistry typically involves PFAS.

Verdict: SkipGeneric waterproof eyeliner carries medium-high PFAS risk from water-resistance chemistry, plus unidentified formulation raises concern for heavy metals in pigments and formaldehyde releasers; use only if brand transparency improves.

Waterproof eyeliners rely on water-resistant formulations that commonly use fluorinated compounds to achieve lasting wear. PFAS use in this category is well-documented.

The safe swap

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

bareMinerals

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Eyeliner pigments, especially in red, yellow, and brown shades, may contain legacy heavy metal colorants. Without brand identity or published heavy metal testing, the risk cannot be ruled out. Eye-area application carries higher systemic exposure risk than products applied elsewhere.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Generic cosmetics of unknown provenance often use cost-effective preservatives such as imidazolidinyl urea or dmdm hydantoin that release formaldehyde over time. Waterproof formulations with extended shelf-life claims are more likely to rely on these agents than shorter-lived natural products.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination

Synthetic polymer-based waterproof eyeliners may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of emulsifier synthesis or solvent processing. This is a known manufacturing contaminant in cosmetics, though typically at low parts-per-million levels in finished products.

70/ 100
🎨

Contact dermatitis and sensitization from fragrance or colorants

Unidentified fragrance compounds or azo dyes in generic eyeliners pose allergic contact dermatitis risk, especially in products claiming long-wear or waterproof properties. The eye area is a sensitive zone with high absorption potential.

70/ 100

Polymer degradation and leaching over product lifespan

Waterproof eyeliners are exposed to heat, humidity, and eye moisture; the polymer coating may degrade over months, potentially releasing uncrosslinked oligomers or residual monomers. Heat storage (bathroom cabinets) accelerates this process.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Waterproof eyeliners typically use silicone, wax, or film-forming polymers combined with pigments and water-repellent agents to resist moisture. The 'waterproof' function almost always involves fluorinated compounds or PFAS-class chemistry to create water barriers on the eyelid. Without a specific brand or formulation disclosed, the base resin type (synthetic polymer vs. natural wax blend) and pigment sourcing remain unknown, creating gaps in safety assessment for heavy metal content and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

No brand is specified for this generic product, so there is no established disclosure history, third-party certifications, or known controversies on record. A generic waterproof eyeliner purchase gives no assurance of ingredient transparency, PFAS-free claims, or heavy metal testing. To reduce risk, seek products with explicit ingredient lists, third-party safety certifications (e.g., Dermatest, EWG verified), or manufacturer commitments to PFAS phase-out.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof eyeliners are higher-risk cosmetics than standard pencils or liquids because waterproofing almost always requires PFAS or silicone-based chemistry. Gel and cream eyeliners without waterproof claims tend to use simpler wax and oil bases with lower PFAS likelihood. Liquid liners marketed as waterproof are particularly prone to contain fluorinated polymers; pencil versions may use simpler formulations but still require verification.

If you buy it

Apply only to the eyelid margin and lash line; avoid contact with mucous membranes or abraded skin to limit systemic absorption of any heavy metals or irritant compounds. Replace if the product hardens, becomes sticky, or shows color separation, as degradation may increase leaching of preservatives or pigments. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to prevent accelerated breakdown of the polymer matrix. Request the full ingredient list from the seller before purchase to screen for known formaldehyde releasers (imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) or heavy metal pigments.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 100% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Generic has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cosmetics

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

bareMinerals

Mineral Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Inhalation risk from powder format

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in powder due to low or absent preservatives

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral-based makeup avoids PFAS entirely.

Risky category by default

Ilia Beauty Clean Makeup

Ilia Beauty

Clean Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Clean formulations avoid PFAS-based chemistries.

Risky category by default

RMS Beauty Organic Makeup

RMS Beauty

Organic Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Limited concern

70
🐛

Pesticide residue

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Oxidation and rancidity of plant oils

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Organic formula avoids PFAS-based ingredients.

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More cosmetics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.