PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall48/ 100Poor
Glossier Makeup

Glossier · Cosmetics

Glossier Makeup

Good

Low-medium risk. Minimal water-resistance features reduce PFAS need.

Verdict: Buy with careGlossier cosmetics lack full ingredient transparency and PFAS status remains unclear; use with awareness of fragrance and pigment sourcing.

Glossier makeup focuses on buildable, natural finishes rather than extreme water resistance or durability claims. This approach typically avoids PFAS-heavy formulations.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague terms like eco-friendly without confirming no PFAS.

90/ 100
🪨

Talc contamination and respirable mineral risk

Glossier does not publicly disclose talc-free certification or asbestos testing for any products using talc. Historical contamination in talc deposits remains a regulatory concern; products applied near lips or inhaled (powders, blush) carry low but non-zero risk if talc sourcing is unvetted.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergen disclosure gaps

Glossier lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without naming constituent allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool, eugenol). Consumers with known fragrance sensitivities cannot assess safety before purchase; EU regulations require allergen labeling, but US does not.

45/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Iron oxides and mica used in Glossier eyeshadows, blushes, and foundations are not independently tested for lead, cadmium, or arsenic on published materials. The brand does not provide ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) test certificates that are standard for premium color cosmetics.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane in emulsifiers or surfactants

Glossier does not disclose whether emulsifiers are 1,4-dioxane-free or vacuum-stripped. This contaminant is possible in polysorbates and PEG compounds but not disclosed without detailed material safety data sheets.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence that Glossier uses DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in current formulations, though ingredient lists do not always distinguish preservative type.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Glossier's makeup formulations typically contain talc or talc-free mineral bases, emollients (silicones or plant oils), iron oxides and mica for pigmentation, and fragrance blends. The brand has not published full chemical composition or third-party safety testing summaries for individual SKUs. Talc sourcing and fragrance allergen disclosure remain opaque across their product range.

The brand's record and disclosure

Glossier does not publish ingredient safety certifications (e.g., EU banned substance lists, heavy metal testing) on consumer-facing materials. The brand markets itself as 'clean beauty' but has not independently verified PFAS-free status or conducted disclosed dermal sensitization trials. No recalls or regulatory actions against Glossier cosmetics are on public record in the US or EU, but their transparency record is below industry leaders like Beautycounter or Ilia.

How it compares in its category

Glossier sits in the premium indie-beauty tier where ingredient disclosure varies widely. Most direct competitors (Rare Beauty, Rhode Beauty) similarly lack full formulation transparency. Brands with certified clean formulations (Kosas, RMS Beauty) undergo stricter third-party vetting and publish heavy metal and PFAS test results; Glossier does not.

If you buy it

Patch test new products on inner arm 48 hours before full application, especially if you have fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis. Avoid contact with eyes and broken skin. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment or emollient degradation. Discard if color, smell, or texture changes unexpectedly, or after 12 months of opening.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 100% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Glossier has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cosmetics

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

bareMinerals

Mineral Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Inhalation risk from powder format

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in powder due to low or absent preservatives

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral-based makeup avoids PFAS entirely.

Risky category by default

Ilia Beauty Clean Makeup

Ilia Beauty

Clean Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Clean formulations avoid PFAS-based chemistries.

Risky category by default

RMS Beauty Organic Makeup

RMS Beauty

Organic Makeup

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Limited concern

70
🐛

Pesticide residue

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Oxidation and rancidity of plant oils

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Organic formula avoids PFAS-based ingredients.

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More cosmetics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.