PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Cleo & Coco Charcoal Deodorant Duo

Georganics · Deodorant

Cleo & Coco Charcoal Deodorant Duo

Excellent

Low-Medium risk from natural formulation with no known PFAS vectors.

Verdict: BuyNatural deodorant with no established hazards in fragrance, heavy metals, or formaldehyde; charcoal and wax base carry minimal risk if sourced responsibly.

This charcoal formula uses powder and wax bases typical of natural cosmetics with no functional PFAS need. Brand silence on sourcing means third-party contamination cannot be ruled out without testing.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

charcoal powder, natural waxes, oils

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Activated charcoal quality varies by source and processing; if sourced from unvetted suppliers, charcoal may retain trace metals (cadmium, lead) depending on feedstock origin. Georganics does not publicly document charcoal sourcing or purity testing, so residual metal content cannot be ruled out but is unlikely at concern-level concentrations.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
🍳

Coating or carrier-oil oxidation and rancidity

Natural oils in deodorant sticks can oxidize if exposed to light or air for extended periods, potentially producing skin irritants. Packaging opacity and seal integrity are not detailed; if jar or container allows light exposure, rancidity risk increases over the product lifespan.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Fragrance allergens and skin sensitization

Georganics lists no synthetic fragrance or essential oils prominently in this duo; however, natural oils in the base (coconut, jojoba, or similar) can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No reported cases specific to this product.

95/ 100

Talc contamination

This product explicitly uses charcoal powder, not talc, eliminating the asbestos and ovarian cancer risk associated with talc-based deodorants. No talc is listed in ingredient disclosures.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Charcoal-wax-oil formulations do not require synthetic preservatives; natural oils have antimicrobial properties. No quaternium, imidazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing agents are disclosed. Risk is minimal.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Cleo & Coco uses activated charcoal powder combined with natural waxes (likely beeswax or plant-based) and oils as the deodorant matrix. Charcoal itself is inert and does not release volatile compounds or leach into skin under normal use. The wax and oil base avoids aluminum compounds and synthetic polymer coatings that carry leaching or degradation risks seen in conventional stick deodorants. No synthetic fragrances or chemical preservatives are listed, which eliminates common allergen vectors in personal care.

The brand's record and disclosure

Georganics markets itself as a natural and organic brand but provides minimal public documentation of third-party certifications or source verification on its website. No recalls or safety controversies have been recorded for this product or parent brand. The company's silence on PFAS sourcing in raw materials (particularly waxes and charcoal) is typical for small natural brands but limits independent confidence in supply-chain screening. Ingredient lists appear straightforward and do not hide components under fragrance disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Natural charcoal deodorants occupy a lower-hazard segment compared to aluminum antiperspirants or talc-containing powders. This product avoids the coating degradation and metal leaching risks of conventional stick formats. It sits alongside other wax-oil-charcoal formulations (common in indie brands) with similar safety profiles. The main trade-off is efficacy: charcoal deodorants do not prevent sweating and rely on odor absorption, so performance expectations differ from antiperspirants.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place; charcoal and wax can soften or separate if exposed to sustained heat above 30C (86F). Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin; excess product can stain light fabrics. Replace every 6-12 months or when consistency changes noticeably. If irritation develops (rare with this formulation), discontinue and rinse skin; fragrance-free status makes true allergic reactions unlikely but individual sensitivities to carrier oils exist.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Georganics has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.