Fig + Green Tea Deodorant
Low-Medium risk powder deodorant unlikely to contain intentional fluorochemicals.
This powder deodorant has no disclosed PFAS treatment or waterproofing and the brand makes no PFAS claims. Powder cosmetics rarely require Teflon-type coating or water-repellent coating coatings.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Powder-based deodorant (mineral/talc/starch base)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Heavy metals
If the base is talc rather than arrowroot, contamination risk exists depending on ore source and processing. Georganics does not publicly disclose talc sourcing or asbestos testing. Modern talc mining in regulated regions is generally asbestos-free, but independent verification is absent here.
Source: FDA ↗Fragrance allergens (fig and green tea extracts)
Natural fragrance compounds in botanical deodorants can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization, especially in high concentrations. Fig and green tea extracts contain compounds (psoralens, tannins) that may cause photosensitivity or irritation in sensitive individuals. No ingredient concentration data is publicly available for this product.
Bacterial growth (moisture entrapment)
Powder formulas stored in humid bathrooms or applied to damp skin can promote bacterial and fungal colonization within the container. This is a handling and storage issue rather than a formulation defect, but risk is standard for all loose powders.
Inhalation hazard (airborne powder particles)
Repeated inhalation of fine mineral powder (talc or arrowroot) during application can deposit particles in respiratory airways. Risk is low with typical use but increases with frequent direct inhalation or use in poorly ventilated spaces. No warning label is standard in this category.
What’s reassuring
Safe base material
Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.
Heavy metals
Mineral-based deodorants may contain trace heavy metals depending on filler quality. Georganics does not publicly disclose heavy metal testing results. Skin absorption from topical powder application is minimal unless skin barrier is compromised.
Source: FDA ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a powder-based deodorant likely combining talc or arrowroot starch with mineral absorbents (possibly magnesium oxide or zinc oxide) and fragrance compounds (fig and green tea extracts/oils). Powder deodorants avoid the polymer coatings and propellants found in aerosols and stick formulas, reducing exposure to volatile organics and synthetic binders. The mineral base itself is chemically inert once applied to skin, though the quality of sourcing and processing determines whether trace contaminants are present.
The brand's record and disclosure
Georganics markets itself as a natural/organic brand with minimal synthetic inputs, but maintains silence on PFAS risk assessment and third-party testing. The brand does not publicly document heavy metal screening, talc purity verification, or independent safety certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, NSF Organic). No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product line. Transparency is limited compared to mainstream competitors.
How it compares in its category
Powder deodorants as a class carry lower systemic toxicity risk than antiperspirant sticks (which contain aluminum salts) and aerosols (which carry VOC and propellant exposure). Among powder alternatives, this product sits mid-range: more transparent than mass-market mineral powders, less verified than lab-tested indie brands. Typical concerns in the category (talc asbestos contamination, heavy metals in mineral fillers) apply here at standard baseline risk.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry location away from humidity to prevent clumping and bacterial growth in the powder. Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin; excess powder offers no added benefit and increases inhalation risk during application. Replace after 6-12 months or if odor develops in the container (sign of microbial colonization). Do not inhale directly from the container; use a dispenser or closed applicator to minimize airborne particle exposure.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Georganics has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Puracy
Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass
Glass jar; water-based cream formula
Fragrance allergens
Limited concern
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Glass container breakage
Moderate concern
Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.
✓Bare metal or glass, no coating at all
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Fragrance allergen content
Limited concern
Baking soda skin irritation
Moderate concern
Microplastic shedding
Limited concern
Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Fragrance allergens
Limited concern
Skin irritation from mineral salts
Limited concern
Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.