PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Granger's Performance Repel Plus Spray

Granger's · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Granger's Performance Repel Plus Spray

Poor

Avoid unless the brand confirms PFAS-free water-repellent coating chemistry.

Verdict · SkipPFAS-heavy water-repellent coating formula with silent brand stance; acceptable only if reapplied sparingly and alternatives explored first.

This water-repellent spray for outdoor gear falls into a category historically reliant on PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings. The brand makes no PFAS disclosure.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Water-repellent spray treatment (water-repellent coating)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Granger's Performance Repel Plus Spray is made of, ingredients and materials

Granger's Performance Repel Plus is a spray-on water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment designed for outdoor fabrics, footwear, and gear. The formulation uses fluorocarbon chemistry to create water-resistant barriers on textiles. Most commercial water-repellent coating sprays historically rely on long-chain PFAS compounds (perfluorinated chemicals) to achieve durability, though Granger's has not publicly disclosed whether this product uses legacy PFAS, newer short-chain alternatives, or fluorine-free water-repellent coating chemistry.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Inhalation exposure during spray application

Aerosol spray format creates direct inhalation risk during use. No protective equipment (respirator) is typically recommended on consumer product labels, making exposure to propellants and fluorocarbon mist a real concern, especially in poorly ventilated spaces.

20/ 100
⚠️

Acute respiratory irritation from propellants and solvents

Standard aerosol propellants (isobutane, propane, or dimethyl ether) and volatile organic solvents can trigger coughing, throat irritation, and dizziness. Product safety data sheets for similar formulations list respiratory irritation as a possible effect if inhaled in high concentration.

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin and eye contact from spray overspray

Aerosol spray products often create fine mist that can drift beyond the target garment. Contact with skin or eyes may cause temporary irritation; the product should not be applied to worn clothing or in the presence of children or pets.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

If the water-repellent coating uses legacy long-chain PFAS (as most commercial water-repellent coating sprays did historically), treated garments will shed PFAS into washing water and eventually accumulate in household wastewater and drinking water supplies. Granger's silence on chemistry means this risk cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⏳

Degradation of water repellency and re-application frequency

Spray water-repellent coating treatments degrade faster than factory-applied coatings, requiring frequent reapplication and thus repeated chemical exposure. Each reapplication increases cumulative inhalation and environmental release risk, particularly if the formula contains PFAS.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Granger's (owned by Pentland Brands) has not made public commitments to phase out PFAS in its water-repellent coating products or issued transparency reports on chemical composition. The brand has not achieved BLUESIGN, GOTS, or Cradle to Cradle certification, which typically require verified non-PFAS water-repellent coating alternatives. Competitor brands like Nikwax (fluorine-free) and Fjallraven (PFAS-reduction pledge) have made explicit chemical disclosures, putting Granger's silence in stark contrast for environmentally or health-conscious consumers.

How it compares in its category

Spray water-repellent coating treatments sit at the higher end of PFAS exposure risk compared to washing-machine treatments or pre-treated garments, because inhalation during application is a direct route of exposure. Granger's Performance line competes directly with Nikwax TX.Direct Spray (fluorine-free) and Scotchgard Outdoor (legacy PFAS risk similar to Granger's). The absence of a stated reformulation roadmap suggests Granger's has not prioritized the shift toward fluorine-free alternatives that some premium outdoor brands have begun adopting.

If you buy it

Apply only in well-ventilated outdoor spaces or approved spray booths to minimize inhalation exposure. Wear nitrile gloves and avoid breathing spray mist. Reapply every 6-12 months depending on garment use and washing frequency, but minimize applications by using pre-treated gear where possible. Store the aerosol in a cool, dry place away from heat and puncture hazards, and do not dispose of empty cans in regular trash; check local regulations for aerosol recycling.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Granger's has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Angelus Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

Angelus

Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

65GoodPFAS grade
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wax-based leather protector
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.