PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good

Harry's · Deodorant

Odor Control Deodorant Redwood

Excellent

Lower concern; typical deodorant formulation unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict · BuyLower concern deodorant with no established recalls or major disclosed hazards; typical formulation poses minimal risk with standard use.

Harry's deodorant uses standard powder base materials without disclosed water-resistant coatings or known PFAS-prone treatments. No brand claim or third-party verification available; typical solid deodorant chemistry poses lower PFAS risk than waterproof cosmetics.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Aluminum, talc, or mineral powder base (typical deodorant)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Odor Control Deodorant Redwood is made of, ingredients and materials

Harry's Redwood deodorant uses a powder base (aluminum compounds, talc, or mineral alternatives) to absorb moisture and odor. Aluminum in antiperspirant/deodorant products has been studied for decades; the concentration and form matter more than presence alone. Talc, if present, carries historical contamination concerns, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is subject to asbestos testing. The Redwood scent profile relies on fragrance compounds, which may include allergens or volatile constituents.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Redwood fragrance is not itemized as individual ingredients on typical product labels; fragrance blends may contain limonene, linalool, or other common allergens. Risk of contact sensitization is possible but not specific to this brand; affects sensitive individuals.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitization to formulation

Individual sensitivity to aluminum salts, talc, or fragrance blends is common but unpredictable. No data suggests Harry's Redwood is more irritating than competing products in this category; risk applies broadly to powder deodorants.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Talc contamination (asbestos risk)

If talc is used as the powder base, modern cosmetic-grade talc in the US is regulated for asbestos absence by the FDA. No established recalls or findings for Harry's Redwood deodorant on this hazard; risk depends on supplier compliance, which is not publicly disclosed.

95/ 100
✅

Aluminum compound systemic uptake

Topical aluminum in antiperspirant form has not been established by regulatory bodies (FDA, EMA) as causing systemic toxicity at typical deodorant concentrations. Concern is primarily theoretical; no product-specific evidence for Harry's Redwood exists.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Mineral or talc-based powders can carry trace lead or cadmium if sourced from contaminated deposits. No recalls or public testing results for this product; risk depends on sourcing and batch testing, which Harry's does not disclose.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Harry's does not publicly disclose ingredient-level safety testing or third-party certifications for this specific product on its website or packaging materials on record. The brand maintains no documented recalls for Redwood deodorant as of available public records. Harry's has not published a formal PFAS commitment or transparency statement, though the formulation is consistent with low-PFAS deodorant design. No major controversies specific to this product line are established in consumer safety databases.

How it compares in its category

Standard aluminum-based or powder deodorants like this occupy the majority of the deodorant market; this product is a conventional offering without specialized claims (e.g., aluminum-free, certified organic, hypoallergenic). Many competitors offer similar formulations with or without third-party certifications (e.g., Cruelty-Free, EWG Verified). Fragrance-based deodorants in this tier typically rely on undisclosed fragrance blends rather than listed essential oils, which is standard industry practice.

If you buy it

Apply to dry skin only; moisture can reduce efficacy and may trap fragrance compounds. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat or direct sunlight to prevent powder clumping or separation. Discontinue use if skin irritation, rash, or contact dermatitis occurs within the first week; sensitivity to aluminum compounds or fragrance allergens may require switching. No special maintenance required; replace when depleted or if scent fades noticeably (typically 3-4 months of daily use).

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Harry's has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Odor Control Deodorant Redwood?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Each & Every The Mini Edit

Each & Every

The Mini Edit

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ EWG Verified
  • cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

Primally Pure

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Beeswax purity and contamination

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More deodorant grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.