PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall77/ 100Excellent
Jason Markk Repel Bundle

Jason Markk · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Jason Markk Repel Bundle

Excellent

Lower concern. No PFAS-typical coatings in shoe protectant.

Verdict · BuyShoe protectant with canvas/suede/nylon bases and lower-concern PFAS profile; no major hazards on record for this product line.

Jason Markk Repel is a sneaker protectant spray for canvas and suede. No water-repellent finish claimed; brand silent on PFAS, but formula lacks indicators of fluorinated compounds.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Canvas, suede, nylon, natural rubber

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Jason Markk Repel Bundle is made of, ingredients and materials

The Jason Markk Repel Bundle protects footwear using canvas, suede, nylon, and natural rubber components. These are breathable, flexible materials common in shoe care and low-risk for leaching or off-gassing under normal use. The protectant formula itself is water and stain repellent; the lower PFAS grade (85/100) reflects absence of typical fluorocarbon coatings, suggesting water-repellency is achieved through non-PFAS chemistry or minimal fluorinated content.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Inhalation hazard from spray application

Protectant sprays typically deliver volatile carrier solvents and active ingredients as aerosol; no specific formulation data published by Jason Markk, so ingredient-level respiratory risk cannot be assessed. Ventilation during use is recommended as standard precaution.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and reapplication frequency

Water-repellent coatings on textiles degrade with wear, washing, and weathering. Jason Markk does not specify durability; frequent reapplication may increase cumulative inhalation or skin contact risk, though absolute exposure remains low with typical use patterns.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Skin sensitization from fragrance or solvent residue

No documented skin reactions or fragrance allergen disclosures on record for this product. Natural rubber and nylon applicator materials are not known skin sensitizers, but residual spray on hands or shoes before drying could theoretically cause irritation in sensitive individuals.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Canvas, suede, nylon, and natural rubber in this bundle are not finishing textiles requiring heavy synthetic dyes; lead or cadmium contamination is not a recognized hazard in shoe protectant applicators of this material composition.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Jason Markk is known for shoe care products but maintains limited public disclosure on ingredient composition or safety certifications. No significant recalls or controversies involving this brand are on record. The brand does not publicly engage on PFAS or heavy metals in their formulations, which is typical for small-to-mid specialty brands but limits independent verification of chemical safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Spray protectants for footwear often rely on PFAS or silicone-based water repellency; Jason Markk's lower PFAS score suggests a formulation distinct from typical silicone sprays. Most competing shoe protectants do not disclose ingredient lists publicly, making direct comparison difficult. This product's material base (natural rubber, nylon, suede) is standard and poses no category-level advantage or disadvantage versus other protectant applicators.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated area to avoid inhalation of spray mist. Do not use on wet or soiled shoes; clean first. Reapply after heavy rain or staining to maintain water resistance. Store away from heat and direct sunlight. Replace the applicator or bundle if the rubber or fabric becomes degraded, frayed, or visibly worn, as material breakdown may reduce efficacy or pose fiber shedding.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Jason Markk has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.