PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Kelty Varicom Waterproof Compression Sack Large

Kelty · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

Kelty Varicom Waterproof Compression Sack Large

Bad

Waterproof sack with unknown coating makeup and PFAS risk.

Verdict · SkipNylon ripstop compression sack with unknown waterproof coating; PFAS risk unconfirmed, brand silent on chemistry. Suitable with maintenance awareness.

This nylon ripstop compression sack has waterproof protection. Kelty doesn't disclose the coating formula or PFAS content.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon ripstop with waterproof coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Kelty has not disclosed the chemistry of the waterproof layer. Traditional nylon coatings often use PFC-based durable water repellents; some brands have switched to polyurethane or wax alternatives. Without lab testing or brand confirmation, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic release

Nylon ripstop coatings naturally wear and flake over time, particularly with UV exposure and washing. Peeling coating fragments may shed microplastics into water or soil, though the volume from a single compression sack is small. Regular inspection and timely replacement minimize this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence of formaldehyde-release finishes in Kelty compression sacks. Ripstop nylon typically uses melamine or polyurethane binders rather than formaldehyde resin, and outdoor gear brands generally avoid formaldehyde due to odor and performance issues.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in nylon colorants

Kelty sacks are typically dyed with standard outdoor-industry colorants. No recalls or complaints related to azo dye toxicity from this product line are on record. Nylon dyes used by established outdoor brands generally meet international safety standards, though composition is not always public.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented cases of lead or cadmium in Kelty nylon textiles. Modern outdoor brands source from suppliers with heavy-metal screening, and compression sacks do not involve ceramic or metal-heavy coating processes.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Kelty Varicom is constructed from nylon ripstop, a durable woven synthetic fabric with a reinforced grid pattern to resist tearing. The waterproofing comes from an unspecified coating applied to the nylon. Since Kelty has not publicly disclosed whether this coating contains PFAS (perfluorinated compounds) or alternative water-repellent chemistry, the actual composition remains a blank spot in the safety profile. Nylon itself is stable and non-toxic under normal use; the uncertainty is entirely in the surface treatment.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kelty is an outdoor gear manufacturer owned by Johnson Outdoors and has a mixed transparency record on chemical composition. The company does not appear to have published a formal PFAS policy or commitment to avoiding PFAS in waterproofing across its product line. No significant recalls or safety controversies specific to compression sacks have been publicly documented. Kelty's silence on coating chemistry is typical for mid-market outdoor brands but leaves buyers without confirmation of whether the coating uses wax or polyurethane instead of fluorinated compounds.

How it compares in its category

Compression sacks occupy a niche between dry bags and basic storage. Many competing brands (including some premium lines from Arc'teryx and Patagonia) now disclose PFAS-free or low-PFAS coatings. Kelty's approach is neither notably worse nor leader-class; it represents the mainstream outdoor industry's incremental shift away from PFC-heavy finishes, though adoption remains incomplete. Budget alternatives often use uncoated or wax-treated nylon, which avoids PFAS but sacrifices water resistance and durability.

If you buy it

Store the sack in a cool, dry place away from direct heat and UV, as synthetic coatings degrade over time. Do not machine wash; clean with a damp cloth and mild soap if needed. Avoid storing damp gear inside for extended periods, as trapped moisture can promote mold growth inside the fabric (not a coating hazard, but a maintenance issue). Replace the sack if the coating visibly cracks, peels, or loses water repellency, typically after 5-10 years of regular use depending on exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kelty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.