PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
US Military Backpack Kelty Multi Purpose Waterproof Bag

Kelty · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

US Military Backpack Kelty Multi Purpose Waterproof Bag

Bad

Unknown waterproof finish; manufacturer refuses PFAS transparency.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof nylon/polyester bag with undisclosed coating; PFAS status unknown and manufacturer silent; no major recalls or contamination reports on record.

This military-grade Kelty backpack pairs nylon and polyester with waterproof coating of unknown composition. Kelty won't disclose PFAS information.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with waterproof coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

Waterproof coating composition (unspecified)

Kelty does not publicly identify the waterproof treatment type. It may contain PFAS (fluorinated polymers), but no independent testing or manufacturer disclosure confirms or denies this. Users cannot assess this risk without additional information from the brand.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and particulate release

As waterproof finishes age and flake from mechanical wear or heat exposure, fine particles may shed into packed contents or onto skin during use. The chemical composition of these shed particles is unknown because the coating itself is undisclosed, creating uncertainty about inhalation or ingestion risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester component

No specific reports of azo dye issues in Kelty multipurpose backpacks. Polyester fabric may use azo dyes in industrial production, but this is standard industry practice and requires direct contact with skin to pose any risk; a backpack worn over clothing is a low-exposure scenario.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

No evidence that Kelty applies flame retardant chemicals to outdoor backpack nylon/polyester. Military-spec backpacks are not typically treated with brominated or phosphorus flame retardants unless specifically marketed as fire-resistant, which this product is not.

Source, EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or testing reports indicate lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Kelty backpack components. Synthetic fabric dyes and metal zippers/buckles in outdoor gear are typically low-heavy-metal designs, though certification is absent.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This backpack uses nylon and polyester with an applied waterproof coating whose specific chemistry Kelty does not publicly disclose. Waterproof treatments on textiles are commonly applied as fluorinated compounds (PFAS-based) or, less commonly, wax or other polymer coatings. Without ingredient transparency, the type and persistence of the water-repellent layer cannot be verified. Nylon and polyester themselves are stable synthetics with low leaching risk under normal use, but the coating is the variable element.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kelty is a US-based outdoor gear manufacturer owned by the Wolverine World Wide group; they do not currently publish PFAS content or waterproof treatment specifications for their products. The brand has no publicly documented recalls or chemical safety controversies specific to this backpack line. Kelty offers no third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or Bluesign) on standard multipurpose bags, which limits independent verification of finish hazards.

How it compares in its category

Military-style waterproof backpacks in this price and use tier typically employ water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes; nylon and polyester bodies are industry standard. Competitors vary widely in coating disclosure, some brands now specify wax-based or PFOA-free treatments, while others remain silent like Kelty. Without manufacturer transparency, this bag occupies a middle position where chemical hazard cannot be ruled in or out relative to alternatives.

If you buy it

Avoid machine washing with hot water, which can degrade waterproof coatings and potentially mobilize additives; hand-wash in cool water if needed. Do not dry clean or expose to prolonged heat (e.g., direct sunlight for weeks), as thermochemical breakdown of the coating accelerates over time. Inspect the interior and exterior for peeling, flaking, or discoloration after 2-3 years of heavy use; this signals coating degradation and may warrant replacement. Store in a cool, dry place away from solvent vapors or chlorinated environments, which can weaken synthetic finishes.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kelty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.