PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
US Military Backpack Kelty Multi Purpose Waterproof New

Kelty · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

US Military Backpack Kelty Multi Purpose Waterproof New

Bad

Military pack has unknown waterproof treatment; PFAS status unclear.

Verdict · SkipKelty backpack with undisclosed waterproof coating poses unknown PFAS risk; no other major textile hazards documented, but durability and coating maintenance are critical.

Kelty's military-spec backpack uses either nylon or polyester with waterproof water-repellent coating of unspecified composition. The brand offers no transparency on PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon or polyester with waterproof water-repellent coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

If the backpack is polyester (rather than nylon), it may contain antimony trioxide as a catalyst remnant from polyester synthesis. Levels in finished textile are typically trace and not known to pose dermal hazard from wearing, but intentional ingestion or chronic dust inhalation could theoretically carry risk. No data specific to Kelty products.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and leaching

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon and polyester backpack fabrics may contain formaldehyde-based finishing resins for wrinkle resistance or shape-holding, but no formaldehyde hazards have been documented for Kelty backpacks. Off-gassing is not a typical concern for heavy outdoor bags.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Kelty backpacks use synthetic dyes for color, but no recalls or test results indicate restricted azo dyes or heavy metal dye contamination. Military-spec products are often dyed with stable, non-toxic pigments.

Source, FDA
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Kelty backpacks are not marketed as flame-retardant and are not subject to flammability regulations for apparel. No flame-retardant chemical treatment is documented or expected in this category.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This backpack is constructed from nylon or polyester fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to achieve waterproofing. The specific chemistry of that coating is not publicly disclosed by Kelty, which is the core safety concern, water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds (perfluorooctanoic acid and related chemicals) to achieve water and oil resistance. Modern alternatives like wax-based or non-fluorinated polymers exist but are not confirmed here. The base fabrics (nylon and polyester) themselves carry minimal chemical hazard when uncoated.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kelty, a subsidiary of Cascade Designs (owned by Helen of Troy), does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or commit to PFAS-free waterproofing on this product line. The company has not achieved third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS, Bluesign) that would restrict PFAS use. No recalls or documented chemical safety violations have been published for Kelty backpacks. Transparency on coating composition remains absent from product labeling and official specifications.

How it compares in its category

Military-spec and outdoor backpacks typically use PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings because of their superior durability and water-repellency under extreme conditions. Premium brands (e.g.Patagonia has transitioned toward alternatives not linked to PFAS and publishes this commitment. Kelty occupies a mid-market position with strong durability reputation but minimal chemical transparency compared to higher-end competitors. This product is not uniquely risky for its category, but competitive backpacks with disclosed non-PFAS coatings are available.

If you buy it

Avoid machine washing above 30 degrees Celsius, as heat can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially mobilize coating residues. Re-apply commercial water-repellent coating treatments (wax-based or fluorine-free brands) every 1-2 years to maintain water repellency and reduce reliance on original coating integrity. Hand wash with cool water and mild soap when soiled; allow air drying away from direct heat or sunlight. Do not dry-clean, as solvents can strip the coating. Inspect seams and coating for visible peeling or degradation annually; discard if coating severely compromises.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kelty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good

UV degradation and additive leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🏭

Odor and volatile organic compounds from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Starting grade for this product type

Marmot Tool Box

Marmot

Tool Box

Nylon, polyester, cotton blend; details unspecified

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
🏭

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyester and nylon manufacturing

Limited concern

70
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry unknown

Moderate concern

45
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored polyester components

Limited concern

70

Verify this is not a garment and check for any water-repellent coating applied.

Starting grade for this product type

Patagonia Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

Patagonia

Guidewater Roll-Top Pack

nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Overall Grade33Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Nylon microplastic shedding (abrasion)

Limited concern

70

Degradation and leachate from aging water-repellent coating

Limited concern

70

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.