PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Kristin Ess Hair One Signature Shampoo

Kristin Ess · Shampoo

Kristin Ess Hair One Signature Shampoo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; standard rinse-off shampoo with no typical PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyRinse-off shampoo with standard safety profile, no major disclosed hazards, lower PFAS risk, suitable for typical use.

Liquid shampoos don't require Teflon-type coating coatings, Teflon-family coating, or water or stain-resistance treatments where PFAS typically appear. No brand PFAS disclosure exists, but the product lacks typical contamination pathways.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base (water, surfactants, conditioning agents)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed component list)

The product contains 'fragrance' as a listed ingredient but does not itemize specific fragrance components (common practice in mass-market shampoos). Potential allergens such as limonene, linalool, or eugenol may be present but are not declared individually. Risk of contact dermatitis is low for most users but higher for fragrance-sensitive individuals.

70/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

Shampoos containing ethoxylated surfactants (common in mainstream formulas) may retain trace 1,4-dioxane from the ethoxylation process, though FDA regulations and industry practices typically keep levels well below 10 ppm. No specific testing data for this product is publicly available.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No independent testing results or disclosures confirm the use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, dioxolane) in this specific product. Industry-standard alternatives (methylchloroisothiazolinone, phenoxyethanol) are more likely but not verified from public sources.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

This is a liquid shampoo with no visible exfoliating beads. Microplastic polymers are not typical ingredients in rinse-off shampoos, only in physical scrubs. No known microplastic concern for this product category.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Shampoos are not heavily pigmented products; they typically contain minimal or no added colorants. Risk of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination is negligible compared to cosmetics like lipsticks or eyeshadows.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kristin Ess Signature Shampoo is a water-based surfactant formula typical of mainstream salon-brand shampoos. The aqueous base means no volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are released during use, and the rinse-off nature limits skin contact time with any conditioning agents or preservatives. Surfactants clean by breaking down oils; conditioning agents (likely silicones or plant extracts based on product positioning) remain on hair but are largely rinsed away, reducing systemic absorption risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kristin Ess is a mass-market hair-care brand owned by Unilever and sold through drugstore and online retailers. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient safety disclosures, sustainability reports, or third-party certifications (such as EWG Verified or Leaping Bunny). No major safety recalls or controversies are on record for this product or brand in consumer databases. Ingredient transparency is typical of conventional drugstore brands rather than premium.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo sits in the mainstream mass-market category, similar to Pantene, Garnier, and Store brands in formulation approach and hazard profile. It lacks the certifications or transparency claims of premium indie or natural brands (like Aveeno or SheaMoisture lines that list fragrance allergen info). Price and performance are competitive; safety profile is consistent with category norms, neither elevated nor reduced risk versus equivalents.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the label: apply to wet hair, lather, rinse thoroughly with cool or warm water. No special heat precautions are needed since shampoo is rinsed away before any hair-styling heat is applied. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy. If scalp irritation or allergic reactions occur, discontinue and consult a dermatologist; fragrance or preservative sensitivity is the most common trigger in this category.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kristin Ess has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.