Laura Mercier · Waterproof Mascara
Laura Mercier Caviar Extravagant Mascara
No PFAS disclosure; waterproof mascaras may use Teflon-family coating. Unconfirmed risk.
Laura Mercier makes no public PFAS statements. Waterproof mascara formulas sometimes contain PFAS-based water-repellent resins, though brand composition is unconfirmed. Request ingredient transparency from manufacturer if concerned.
The better-graded swap
Burt's Bees
Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Pigments, waxes, oils, waterproof film-forming resins
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Laura Mercier Caviar Extravagant Mascara is made of, ingredients and materials
Laura Mercier Caviar Extravagant Mascara is formulated with pigments, waxes, oils, and waterproof film-forming resins. The waterproof component typically involves synthetic polymers that lock moisture out, but the specific resin chemistry is not publicly detailed by the brand. Waterproof mascaras require stronger binding agents than standard formulas, which increases the chance of synthetic additives with limited transparency.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Waterproof mascaras commonly use Teflon-family coating or fluorinated additives; Laura Mercier discloses neither waterproof chemistry nor PFAS testing. Risk is unconfirmed but category-typical for this product type.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components
Product may contain fragrance; Laura Mercier does not disclose fragrance allergen specifics. Eyes are sensitive tissue; fragrance constituents can trigger irritation or allergic contact dermatitis in susceptible users.
Polymer film degradation and additive leaching over time
Waterproof mascaras stored in warm or humid conditions can soften or crack, releasing waterproof resin components and additives onto the eye area. No specific degradation data exists for this brand, but is a known risk across the product category.
Bacterial or fungal contamination in tube if cap seal fails
Waterproof mascaras are hygroscopic and the high oil and wax content creates an environment where bacteria or fungi can grow if the tube is not airtight. Laura Mercier does not disclose preservative systems or seal integrity testing.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
Laura Mercier does not publish pigment sourcing or heavy metal testing for this mascara. Iron oxide and synthetic ultramarines are regulated in cosmetics but trace lead or cadmium contamination is not ruled out without third-party testing.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Laura Mercier provides no public disclosure of PFAS use, heavy metal testing results for pigments, or ingredient sourcing for colorants. The brand does not publish safety data sheets or third-party certifications for mascara lines. This silence is typical of mainstream prestige cosmetics, but limits independent verification of waterproof resin composition.
How it compares in its category
Waterproof mascaras as a class carry higher PFAS risk than water-based alternatives because Teflon-family coating are common in water-repellent cosmetics. Laura Mercier sits in the prestige segment, where ingredient transparency is often weaker than mass-market or certified clean brands. Brands with explicit PFAS-free claims or third-party testing (e.g., Beautycounter, Ilia) offer more verifiable alternatives in the waterproof mascara space.
If you buy it
Patch test on inner arm or waterline 24 hours before full use, as formulation complexity can trigger sensitivity in eyes. Remove with oil-based or micellar cleansers to avoid tugging and degradation of the lash line. Do not heat the tube or leave it in direct sunlight, as waterproof polymer films may degrade and leach additives. Replace every 3 months to avoid bacterial buildup inside the tube.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Laura Mercier has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Laura Mercier Caviar Extravagant Mascara?
- Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)
- Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- pigments, waxes, polymers (unspecified)
- Lead
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- pigments, waxes, film-formers in liquid mascara
- Heavy metals
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore waterproof mascara grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.