PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Control Antiperspirant Deodorant Fresh Spring

Lume · Deodorant

Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Control Antiperspirant Deodorant Fresh Spring

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for typical cosmetic formulation, but brand makes no disclosure.

Verdict · BuyTalc-free mineral powder base with standard aluminum compounds; no established safety red flags; typical cosmetic transparency; lower-risk choice in category.

This Lume deodorant-antiperspirant is water-based with no water-repellent coating treatment, nonstick coating, or grease-resistant finish typical of PFAS use. Aluminum salts are standard antiperspirant actives unrelated to PFAS.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqua-based gel/cream with talc-free mineral powder and aluminium compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Fresh Spring is made of, ingredients and materials

Lume Plus is an aqueous gel-cream base combined with talc-free mineral powder and aluminum compounds (likely aluminum zirconium or aluminum chlorohydrate), which are standard antiperspirant actives used to block sweat ducts. The absence of talc removes a historical contamination concern (talc sourced near asbestos deposits can carry trace asbestos fibers), making this formulation lower-risk than older powder deodorants. Aqua-based gels are generally gentler than alcohol-heavy formulations and less likely to trigger skin irritation in sensitive users.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🔩

Aluminum salts (systemic absorption)

Aluminum chlorohydrate and aluminum zirconium are standard antiperspirant actives with decades of regulatory approval (FDA generally recognized as low concern for this use). However, chronic dermal absorption through repeated daily application remains theoretically possible in sensitive individuals or if skin barrier is compromised; evidence of systemic toxicity from topical antiperspirant use is not est

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Lume's 'Fresh Spring' scent is undisclosed in ingredient lists (fragrance compounds are typically protected trade secrets in cosmetics). Common fragrance components include linalool, limonene, and other volatile organics that can trigger allergic contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in 1-3 percent of users; unscented variants carry minimal risk.

70/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Talc-free mineral powders (often mica, silica, or other naturally derived minerals) can carry trace heavy metals like lead or cadmium depending on ore source; Lume does not publish third-party heavy-metal test results. This is a general concern for mineral-based cosmetics, not Lume-specific, but transparency would mitigate risk perception.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitization with repeated use

Online consumer reviews document occasional localized irritation, rash, or itching in a small minority of users; this is typical for antiperspirant products and does not indicate a systemic safety failure. Irritation is usually reversible upon discontinuation and is not associated with the formulation specifically but rather individual skin sensitivity to aluminum salts or fragrance.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No known formaldehyde or formaldehyde-donor preservatives are listed in Lume's ingredient disclosure. Aqua-based formulations typically use parabens or phenoxyethanol as preservatives, which do not release formaldehyde; however, full preservative system is not publicly detailed.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Lume has marketed itself as a 'natural' and 'clinically tested' deodorant but provides minimal public ingredient transparency beyond marketing claims; no third-party certifications (organic, EWG Verified, etc.) are visible. No major recalls or established safety controversies are on record for this product line. The brand has not made explicit public statements about PFAS screening or heavy-metal testing, which is typical for mid-market personal care brands but falls short of industry leaders in transparency.

How it compares in its category

Lume Plus sits in the mid-market antiperspirant category, comparable to Schmidt's Naturals or Secret brands in formulation risk profile. It avoids talc (an advantage over many legacy brands) and uses standard aluminum salts rather than novel chemistry, making it a conventional choice. Most deodorants in this tier carry similar or higher PFAS exposure risk and comparable disclosure gaps; Lume's aqua-based approach is slightly more skin-friendly than aerosol or alcohol-dominant competitors.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation and maximize efficacy; do not apply to broken or inflamed skin. Rotate application sites if daily use causes localized irritation. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat, as cream-based formulas can separate or degrade if exposed to high temperatures. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or persistent irritation develops; patch-test on inner arm first if you have sensitive skin or aluminum sensitivity.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lume has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Control Antiperspirant Deodorant Fresh Spring?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Each & Every The Mini Edit

Each & Every

The Mini Edit

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ EWG Verified
  • cosmetic formulations, primary ingredients listed
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

Primally Pure

UNSCENTED SENSITIVE DEODORANT Primally Pure Skincare

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • natural mineral powders, plant-based actives, beeswax
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Beeswax purity and contamination

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More deodorant grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.