PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Lume Invisible Cream Whole Body Deodorant

Lume · Deodorant

Lume Invisible Cream Whole Body Deodorant

Excellent

Lower concern; no PFAS triggers in formulation, but brand hasn't transparently addressed it.

Verdict: BuyWater-based cream deodorant with no established hazards; PFAS absent from known formula; brand transparency modest but product safety profile clean.

Lume's water-based cream contains cyclopentasiloxane, dimethicone, starch, and mineral pigments with no nonstick or water-resistant coatings typical of PFAS products. The brand hasn't publicly addressed its PFAS stance.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based cream; cyclopentasiloxane, dimethicone, starch, mineral pigments

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Lume uses proprietary fragrance blends; full ingredient disclosure of fragrance components is not provided on label or website. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity should request full INCIs or perform patch testing, though reported adverse events are not established for this brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Lume discloses use of mineral pigments for color but does not specify sources or heavy metal testing (lead, cadmium, arsenic limits). Mineral pigments in cosmetics are regulated, and no contamination has been reported for this product; however, third-party testing is not publicly available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Silicone dermal accumulation

Cyclopentasiloxane and dimethicone are not bioaccumulative at skin application rates, but individuals with severe silicone sensitivity should avoid. No clinical evidence of harm at cosmetic use levels; concern is theoretical for very frequent, high-volume users.

95/ 100

Starch and bacterial or fungal growth

Starch can theoretically support microbial growth if the product becomes damp or contaminated. Proper storage (dry, sealed container) and hand hygiene during application mitigate risk. No documented cases of infection linked to Lume products.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) appear in disclosed ingredients. Preservative system is not fully detailed; standard cosmetic preservatives used do not carry formaldehyde risk at permitted levels.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Lume Invisible Cream is a water-based formulation built on cyclopentasiloxane (a silicone that dries quickly and leaves no residue) and dimethicone (another silicone for smoothness), plus starch for absorption and mineral pigments for color. This chemistry avoids aluminum salts and talc, common concerns in antiperspirants and powders. The water base means no alcohol harshness, and silicones in cosmetics are established as low-migration, low-toxicity ingredients at approved concentrations.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lume has built marketing around transparency (no aluminum, no talc, no baking soda) but has not published formal safety certifications (EWG verification, Dermatologically Tested claims are standard for competitors). The brand does not publicly address PFAS, though the disclosed ingredients carry no documented PFAS triggers. No major safety recalls or substantiated allegations of harm are on record for this product line.

How it compares in its category

Lume sits in the premium natural-leaning deodorant space alongside brands like Native and Schmidt's. Unlike many conventional antiperspirants, it omits aluminum chloride (which prevents sweating but raises bioaccumulation questions). Compared to talc-based powders, the starch-silicone blend reduces inhalation risk. Fragrance allergen load appears comparable to mainstream options.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin; cream deodorants benefit from skin moisture balance, so avoid over-application in very humid climates where it may pill. Store below 25°C to preserve texture; silicones are stable but can separate in heat. Replace every 6 months or when odor control declines. Patch-test if you have sensitive skin, as fragrance or starch may trigger contact dermatitis in rare cases.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lume has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.