PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Mac Face Body Foundation

MAC · BB Cream

Mac Face Body Foundation

Excellent

Lower-concern liquid foundation with no coating or water-repellent finish on record.

Verdict · BuyWater-based liquid foundation with established safety profile; no reported heavy-metal or formaldehyde issues; MAC lacks PFAS transparency but product class poses minimal PFAS risk.

MAC Face Body Foundation is a liquid foundation with water, silicones, and pigments. No water-repellent finish, Teflon-type coating, or Teflon-family coating additives are on record. The brand has no PFAS statement on record.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Liquid foundation with water, silicones, pigments

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Mac Face Body Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

MAC Face Body Foundation is a water-based liquid foundation with silicones (dimethicone), synthetic pigments, and humectants. The water base and absence of ceramic or enamel coatings eliminate concerns around lead/cadmium in glazes or aluminum leaching seen in some cookware. Silicones in cosmetics are chemically inert once applied and not systemically absorbed, making them low-risk for typical application. Synthetic iron oxides and mica are standard colorants in this category and carry no established toxicity at cosmetic concentrations.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing impurity)

Water-based emulsified cosmetics can contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct if ethoxylated surfactants are used. MAC does not publish dioxane testing data; no product-specific recall or alert exists, but non-disclosure means possible low-level presence cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

If this formula contains fragrance (common in MAC foundations), specific fragrance allergens are not itemized on labels per industry practice. Individuals with contact dermatitis or fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or request full ingredient disclosure from MAC directly.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal contamination from non-sterile application

Liquid foundations with water content can support microbial growth if applicators (brushes, fingers) introduce contamination. This is a usage risk, not a manufacturing defect; proper applicator hygiene and timely replacement (6-12 months) mitigate this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

No recalls or regulatory action against MAC Face Body Foundation for heavy-metal contamination. Synthetic iron oxides and mica used in modern foundations are refined to strict purity standards; lead/cadmium concerns are primarily historical in ceramics and glazes, not liquid cosmetics.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

MAC does not disclose use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) in publicly available ingredient lists for this product. Standard preservatives in this formula appear to be phenoxyethanol or parabens, which do not release formaldehyde.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC Cosmetics (Estee Lauder subsidiary) does not publicly commit to PFAS-free formulations or disclose PFAS testing data, placing it in the silent/opaque tier for this hazard class. The brand has not faced major recalls or safety controversies tied to heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or banned dyes in recent years. MAC's ingredient lists are publicly available, and third-party testing for banned colorants (azo dyes) has not flagged this product line. No formal toxicology certifications (like Leaping Bunny or Clean Beauty) are claimed by the brand.

How it compares in its category

Liquid foundations like this are generally lower-risk than powder formulations (which can trap dust and microparticles) or heavy cream bases (higher occlusion). MAC's formula is typical for mid-to-high-end foundations, water-silicone emulsion with synthetic colorants. Brands offering explicit PFAS-free claims or third-party certifications (e.g., Beautycounter, Glossier) provide more transparency, but the absence of transparency does not indicate presence of harm. Most silicone-based liquid foundations share the same safety profile.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment degradation or separation. Do not heat the product or apply to skin directly exposed to high temperatures (e.g., immediately before sauna use), as this does not pose a safety risk but may compromise wear. Replace after 6-12 months of regular use; liquid foundations can develop bacterial growth if contaminated with water or non-sterile applicators. Perform a patch test on inner arm 24 hours before full facial use if you have sensitive skin or fragrance allergies.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Mac Face Body Foundation?

  • mineral pigments, wax, oils in stick form
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • Water-based gel cream with mineral pigments and SPF actives
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More bb cream grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.