PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall51/ 100Good
Manduka Dhara Capri Legging

Manduka · Activewear

Manduka Dhara Capri Legging

Good

Lower concern legging, but no PFAS transparency from brand.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester blend with lower PFAS concern and no known dye or finish hazards on record; standard activewear profile with good durability expectations.

Manduka's Dhara Capri is a basic nylon/polyester legging with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant finishes. Brand provides no PFAS information or certifications, leaving treatment status uncertain.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Manduka Dhara Capri Legging is made of, ingredients and materials

The Dhara Capri is a nylon/polyester blend, a common athletic knit that balances stretch, moisture management, and durability. Nylon is a synthetic thermoplastic that resists pilling and holds shape well through washing and wear. Polyester adds crease resistance and quick-dry properties. Neither fiber is inherently problematic, but both can be finished with dyes, resins, or treatments that warrant scrutiny. The nylon/poly blend carries no documented heavy-metal dye issues specific to Manduka's production.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester fibers are sometimes synthesized using antimony trioxide as a catalyst. Antimony is retained in trace amounts in finished fiber and is not known to leach significantly from worn garments under normal use. No documented risk from wearing polyester apparel containing residual antimony; hazard is theoretical and not established in textile epidemiology.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

All synthetic-fiber garments including nylon/polyester shed microscopic fibers during wear and washing. Nylon is denser than some alternatives and sheds less readily than acrylic or cheap polyester, but shedding is unavoidable. Relevance is environmental, not dermal; no documented health hazard from wearing or handling the garment itself.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Azo dyes and aniline-based dyes

Manduka products are not documented in public recalls or safety alerts for unsafe dye chemistry. Nylon and polyester are compatible with both safe and restricted dye classes; without independent test results or third-party certification, no hazard can be confirmed for this specific dyed garment.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon/polyester blends do not routinely require formaldehyde-based wrinkle or shape-retention finishes, though they may be applied by some manufacturers. No formaldehyde-related complaints or recalls are on record for Manduka apparel. New garment odor, if present, typically dissipates after first washing and does not indicate hazardous residue.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Manduka is not flagged in public textile testing databases or recall systems for lead, cadmium, or chromium in apparel. Without independent testing or third-party certification (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign), presence cannot be ruled out, but brand reputation and market positioning suggest standard commercial dye compliance.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Manduka has built reputation in the yoga and activewear space with sustainability messaging, but does not publicly disclose independent third-party testing results for heavy metals, azo dyes, or formaldehyde resins in finished garments. The brand has not faced documented recalls or regulatory actions for textile hazards. Their silence on PFAS (water-repellency treatments) reflects industry-wide opacity; no evidence of intentional PFAS application in this legging, but also no formal commitment to avoid it.

How it compares in its category

Most mid-market athletic leggings use nylon/polyester blends; this material profile is standard, not exceptional. Manduka's brand positioning suggests tighter quality control than fast-fashion alternatives, but direct peer comparison data (e.g., heavy-metal or formaldehyde testing vs. Patagonia, Girlfriend Collective, or Lululemon) is not publicly available. The lower PFAS score relative to category average suggests less aggressive water-proofing treatment than some competitors, which is a marginal advantage for this use case.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry to minimize fiber microrelease and preserve elasticity; hot water and tumble-drying accelerate wear and degrade nylon structure faster. Inspect seams and high-friction zones (waistband, inner thigh) every 6, 12 months; pilling and seam fraying are normal, not hazard signals, but indicate replacement timing approaching. Avoid prolonged storage in direct sunlight, which degrades nylon over years. No special precautions needed for formaldehyde or dye transfer; standard laundry practice is sufficient.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 65% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Manduka has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More activewear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.